Skip to main content

Page Banner(Taxonomy)

District of ohio

In re Pattison

Ruling
Court sustained trustee's confirmation objection since debtor had more monthly income available as disposable income.
Procedural posture

Movant chapter 13 trustee objected to confirmation of respondent debtor's plan.

ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of In re Pattison Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member

opinion summary, case decided on July 06, 2006 , LexisNexis #0806-067

In re Taranto

Ruling
Court overruled creditor's objectionto confirmation since requiring both accelerated payment as well as interest from debtor would have been unjustified windfall.
Procedural posture

A creditor objected to confirmation of the bankruptcy debtors'proposed second amended chapter 13 plan.

ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of In re Taranto Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member

opinion summary, case decided on June 26, 2006 , LexisNexis #0706-119

In re Berghoff

Ruling
Court ordered mortgagee to pay debtor's fees since mortgagee violated Rule 9011 by unintentionally filing proof of claim that included attorneys'fees.
Procedural posture

In debtor's bankruptcy proceeding, creditor mortgagee filed a proof of claim that impermissibly included attorney fees as a component of the claim amount. The court issued an order on the mortgagee to show cause why it did not violate Fed. R. Bankr. P. 9011.

ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of In re Berghoff Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member

opinion summary, case decided on June 20, 2006 , LexisNexis #0706-105

Gorski v. Eisen (In re Henricks Commerce Park LLC)

Ruling
Panel affirmed decision to deny attorneys'fees as administrative expenses since fees were, in effect, services for debtor.
Procedural posture

Appellant, the equity security holder of the debtor, appealed from a decision of the Bankruptcy Court for the Northern District of Ohio that disallowed as an administrative expense under 11 U.S.C. § 503(b)(3)(D) and (4) the professional fees of the equity security holder's attorney on the basis that the attorney's services made a substantial contribution to the debtor's chapter 11 case.

ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of Gorski v. Eisen (In re Henricks Commerce Park LLC) Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member

Court :
Judge or Jurisdiction information not available
opinion summary, case decided on June 15, 2006 , LexisNexis #0706-015

In re Rudicil

Ruling
Motion to avoid judicial lien was denied exclusion of dower interest did not impair debtors'exemptions.
Procedural posture

Bankruptcy debtors, a husband and wife, moved to avoid a judicial lien pursuant to 11 U.S.C. § 522(f), alleging that prior liens against the debtors'residence, including the dower interest of the wife, exceeded the value of the residence, and thus the judicial lien impaired the debtors'homestead exemptions.

ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of In re Rudicil Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member

opinion summary, case decided on June 07, 2006 , LexisNexis #0706-057

Palik v. Sexton (In re Sexton)

Ruling
Domestic relations case's findings did not collaterally estop debtor from litigating whether debt was derived from willful and malicious conduct and thus whether it was dischargeable.
Procedural posture

In his Complaint to Determine Dischargeability of Debt, plaintiff, who was defendant debtor's former spouse, alleged that certain debts arose out of or related to willful and malicious injury to him and his property, and, therefore, were nondischargeable pursuant to 11 U.S.C. § 523(a)(6). The matter was before the Court upon his Motion for Summary Judgment.

ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of Palik v. Sexton (In re Sexton) Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member

opinion summary, case decided on May 30, 2006 , LexisNexis #0606-126

In re Harris

Ruling
Debtor was denied motion to extend automatic stay since debtor did not rebut presumption of bad faith in making later filing.
Procedural posture

Before the court in a chapter 13 matter was a mortgage holder's motion seeking entry of an order confirming that the automatic stay was no longer in effect in the case pursuant to 11 U.S.C. § 362(c)(3), debtor's motion to extend the automatic stay pursuant to section 362(c)(3)(B).

ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of In re Harris Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member

opinion summary, case decided on May 01, 2006 , LexisNexis #0506-108

Unencumbered Assets Trust v. Biomar Techs. Inc. (In re Natl Century Fin. Enters.)

Ruling
Payments to software company were deemed fraudulent transfers since debtor was insolvent when payments were made and software company did not show its software affected debtor's revenue.
Procedural posture

Plaintiff successor to a bankruptcy debtor-in-possession brought an adversary proceeding against defendant software company, alleging that payments by the debtor to the company for software licenses and services provided to third-party healthcare providers were fraudulent transfers under 11 U.S.C. § 548. The successor also objected to the company's proof of claim for services to the providers.

ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of Unencumbered Assets Trust v. Biomar Techs. Inc. (In re Natl Century Fin. Enters.) Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member

opinion summary, case decided on April 18, 2006 , LexisNexis #0506-056

Corzin v. Larson (In re Larson)

Ruling
Funds in debtor's pension plan were deemed not estate property since the funds were not withdrawn from the plan and retained anti-alienation protection under ERISA.
Procedural posture

Plaintiff bankruptcy trustee brought an adversary proceeding against defendant debtor seeking turnover of funds in the debtor's pension plan which was governed by the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 ("ERISA"), 29 U.S.C. §§ 1001, et seq. The debtor asserted that the funds were not estate property in view of the anti-alienation clause in the plan under 29 U.S.C. § 1056(d)(1).

ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of Corzin v. Larson (In re Larson) Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member

opinion summary, case decided on April 17, 2006 , LexisNexis #0506-130

In re Vargas

Ruling
Debtor was granted turnover of refund from IRS, and IRS was denied relief from automatic stay since, after plan confirmation, IRS's setoff right did not provide cause for lifting stay.
Procedural posture

Prior to filing their bankruptcy petition, debtors had federal tax liability and were entitled to a tax refund. After the debtor's plan was confirmed, the debtors moved to require the IRS to turn over the refund, and the debtors objected to the IRS's motion for relief from the automatic bankruptcy stay to allow the IRS to set off the refund against the debtors'liability.

ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of In re Vargas Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member

opinion summary, case decided on April 17, 2006 , LexisNexis #0606-080