Skip to main content

Page Banner(Taxonomy)

judge ellington

In re Pursue Energy Corp.

Ruling
Claim disallowed due to creditor's failure to provide supporting documentation.
Procedural posture

The creditor filed a claim against the chapter 11 debtor's estate. The debtor objected to the claim, because the creditor failed to produce any documentation to show the validity and amount of the claim.

ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of In re Pursue Energy Corp. Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member

Commercial opinion summary, case decided on October 23, 2009 , LexisNexis #1209-099

McCoy v. Mississippi State Tax Commn (In re McCoy)

Ruling
Debtor's prepetition tax liabilities were nondischargeable.
Procedural posture

Plaintiff debtor, a Mississippi taxpayer, brought an adversary complaint seeking a declaration from this Court that her debt to the State for pre-petition income taxes arising out of her tax obligations for the 1998 and 1999 tax years were discharged in her chapter 7 bankruptcy. Defendant, the State tax commission, moved to dismiss the complaint pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(6).

ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of McCoy v. Mississippi State Tax Commn (In re McCoy) Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member

Consumer opinion summary, case decided on August 31, 2009 , LexisNexis #1009-012

In re Busby

Ruling
Negative equity was not included in secured portion of 910 vehicle claim under hanging paragraph.
Procedural posture

Debtors filed a petition under chapter 13 of the Bankruptcy Code, and a creditor filed a claim in the amount of $ 26,308.22 on a vehicle the debtors purchased less than 910 days before they declared bankruptcy. A trustee was appointed to represent the bankruptcy estate, and he filed an objection to the creditor's claim.

ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of In re Busby Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member

Consumer opinion summary, case decided on August 28, 2008 , LexisNexis #1108-052

In re Armstrong & Guy Law Office LLC

Ruling
Relief from stay granted to allow attorneys'fee litigation related to Fen-Phen liability cases to move forward.
Procedural posture

In a state court civil action, debtors were scheduled to defend a case involving contract and fee-splitting disputes among attorneys in the prosecution of numerous Fen-Phen cases. After the debtors filed voluntary chapter 11 petitions, the attorneys sought modifications of the automatic stay under 11 U.S.C. § 362(d)(1) to permit the underlying litigation to go forward.

ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of In re Armstrong & Guy Law Office LLC Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member

Commercial opinion summary, case decided on December 21, 2007 , LexisNexis #0208-001