Skip to main content

Page Banner(Taxonomy)

judge gropper

CIT Group Inc. v. Tyco Intl Ltd. (In re CIT Group Inc.)

Ruling
Claim based on rights under tax agreement with debtor's parent in corporate restructuring including stock issuance did not arise form the sale of a security and was not subject to subordination.
Procedural posture

Pending were cross-motions for summary judgment filed by plaintiff, the reorganized debtor, and by defendant, its former indirect parent company. Debtor argued that a claim filed by the parent should be subordinated, 11 U.S.C.S. § 510(b), as one for damages arising from the sale of debtor's securities because the tax agreement on which it was based was entered into as an integral part of the spinoff of debtor from the parent's corporate group.

ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of CIT Group Inc. v. Tyco Intl Ltd. (In re CIT Group Inc.) Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member

Commercial opinion summary, case decided on December 21, 2011 , LexisNexis #0112-083

In re Millennium Global Emerging Credit Master Fund Ltd.

Ruling
Foreign main proceeding recognized where there was no evidence of a center of main interest in any other location.
Procedural posture

Petitioner liquidators of debtors in a foreign insolvency proceeding asserted that Bermuda was the center of main interests (COMI) of the debtors within the meaning of 11 U.S.C.S. § 1502(4) and that the insolvency proceeding was properly brought in Bermuda. The liquidators petitioned for recognition of the proceeding as a foreign main proceeding, and an objector opposed the petition on the ground that Bermuda was not the debtors' COMI.

ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of In re Millennium Global Emerging Credit Master Fund Ltd. Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member

Commercial opinion summary, case decided on August 26, 2011 , LexisNexis #0911-102

In re Toft

Ruling
Recognition of foreign main proceeding for purpose of obtaining debtor's emails stored on U.S. servers denied as contrary to public policy.
Procedural posture

The foreign representative in a German insolvency proceeding of debtor, an orthopedic surgeon alleged to have debts exceeding 5.6 million Euros, initiated the instant chapter 15 proceeding for the purpose of gaining access to debtor's E-mail accounts stored on the servers of two internet service providers located in the United States. Under 11 U.S.C.S. § 1506, the issue was whether such relief was manifestly contrary to public policy.

ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of In re Toft Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member

Consumer opinion summary, case decided on July 22, 2011 , LexisNexis #0811-103

In re General Growth Props.

Ruling
Retirement fund entitled to default rate of interest on loan to debtor pursuant to terms of promissory note.
Procedural posture

Debtor filed a petition under Chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy Code, and proposed a plan for reorganizing its business operating shopping malls. The Comptroller of the State of New York, as trustee of the Common Retirement Fund, filed an objection to the debtor's plan.

ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of In re General Growth Props. Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member

Commercial opinion summary, case decided on June 16, 2011 , LexisNexis #0711-058

In re 114 Tenth Ave. Assocs.

Ruling
Mortgagee held secured claim for postpetition interest on mortgage secured by foreclosed property.
Procedural posture

A mortgagee whose claim against a chapter 11 debtor's estate was previously allowed filed a demand for interest. The mortgagee alleged that interest was due from the date of a foreclosure sale at the statutory prejudgment rate of 9 percent pursuant to N.Y. C.P.L.R. 5001(a).

ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of In re 114 Tenth Ave. Assocs. Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member

Commercial opinion summary, case decided on March 25, 2011 , LexisNexis #0711-033

Moelis & Co. LLC v. Wilmington Trust FSB (In re Gen. Growth Props. Inc.)

Ruling
Dispute over advisor's fee to be paid out of funds otherwise reserved for debtor's noteholders was within bankruptcy court's core jurisdiction.
Procedural posture

Citing 28 U.S.C.S. § 1334 and 28 U.S.C.S. § 1452 as grounds, plaintiff consultant moved the court to remand or to abstain from deciding a suit filed by plaintiff in state court (Suit) against defendant indenture trustee, which defendant then removed on claims that the action "arose in" or was "related to" a chapter 11 matter over which the court properly exercised post- confirmation jurisdiction. Defendant opposed relief.

ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of Moelis & Co. LLC v. Wilmington Trust FSB (In re Gen. Growth Props. Inc.) Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member

Commercial opinion summary, case decided on February 25, 2011 , LexisNexis #0311-098

In re Jennifer Convertibles Inc.

Ruling
Assumption of licenses by debtor furniture store operator approved where licensor was adequately protected.
Procedural posture

Bankruptcy debtors sought approval of their joint plan of reorganization which provided for substantive consolidation of the debtors, which consisted of debtors operating furniture stores and one debtor which operated several stores, and the debtors sought to assume trademark usage licenses entered into by the one debtor and a licensor which was also the one debtor's primary supplier. The licensor objected to the plan and the assumption.

ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of In re Jennifer Convertibles Inc. Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member

Commercial opinion summary, case decided on February 04, 2011 , LexisNexis #0211-112

In re Probulk Inc.

Ruling
Tonnage and tax claims of Liberian ship registry were entitled to priority status.
Procedural posture

A chapter 7 trustee filed objections seeking to reclassify four claims as general unsecured claims. The claims were asserted by the exclusive administrator of the Liberian ship registry (administrator), who alleged that the claims represented annual tonnage and other taxes due to Liberia and were entitled to priority under 11 U.S.C.S. § 507(a)(8)(B) and (a)(8)(C).

ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of In re Probulk Inc. Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member

Commercial opinion summary, case decided on December 23, 2010 , LexisNexis #0211-077

In re General Growth Props.

Ruling
State court securities litigation against debtor and its directors violated stay.
Procedural posture

Debtor corporations filed a motion seeking sanctions against a shareholder and the shareholder's counsel for violating the stay that was imposed pursuant to 11 U.S.C.S. § 362 when the debtors declared chapter 11 bankruptcy.

ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of In re General Growth Props. Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member

Commercial opinion summary, case decided on March 24, 2010 , LexisNexis #0610-003

Nisselson v. Empyrean Inv. Fund LP (In re MarketXT Holdings Corp.)

Ruling
Transfer by debtor of proceeds of stock sale to investment fund avoided as fraudulent.
Procedural posture

Trustee brought an adversary proceeding against defendant investment fund alleging that a transfer of the proceeds of a sale of stock held by a bankruptcy debtor to the fund constituted an intentionally and constructively fraudulent transfer under bankruptcy law and state law.

ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of Nisselson v. Empyrean Inv. Fund LP (In re MarketXT Holdings Corp.) Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member

Commercial opinion summary, case decided on March 12, 2010 , LexisNexis #0510-033