Skip to main content

Page Banner(Taxonomy)

judge cangilos ruiz

In re Albert Lindley Lee Mem. Hosp.

Ruling
State's reimbursement claim for unemployment insurance compensation benefits was an excise tax entitled to priority.
Procedural posture

Debtor filed an Objection to Claim No. 179 filed by a claimant, the New York State Department of Labor, Unemployment Insurance Division.

ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of In re Albert Lindley Lee Mem. Hosp. Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member

Commercial opinion summary, case decided on May 07, 2010 , LexisNexis #0810-047

Martyak v. Tioga County (In re Martyak)

Ruling
Chapter 13 debtor's efforts to challenge auction sale of real property to satisfy delinquent real estate taxes denied.
Procedural posture

In this adversary proceeding, plaintiff debtor sought recovery of title to real property and imposition of sanctions against defendants, a county, various county officials, and others involved in the auction sale of real property that had been owned by the debtor.

ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of Martyak v. Tioga County (In re Martyak) Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member

Consumer opinion summary, case decided on February 05, 2010 , LexisNexis #0410-011

In re Dickerson

Ruling
Debtor's counsel sanctioned for delayed filing, misdating of bank documents and inadequate representation of debtor at creditors' meeting.
Procedural posture

The United States Trustee asserted that counsel for a bankruptcy debtor unduly delayed filing the debtor's case, failed to contemporaneously date bankruptcy documents when executed, and inadequately represented the debtor with regard to meetings of creditors. The Trustee moved for sanctions against counsel, and the bankruptcy court conducted additional hearings with regard to counsel's conduct in other cases.

ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of In re Dickerson Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member

Consumer opinion summary, case decided on December 08, 2009 , LexisNexis #0110-039

Lurgi Inc. v. Northeast Biofuels LP (Northeast Biofuels LP)

Ruling
Court refused to enjoin debtor from drawing down on irrevocable standby letter of credit.
Procedural posture

Plaintiff contractor sued defendant debtor, creditor, and issuer, seeking to enjoin them from taking any action to draw down on an irrevocable standby letter of credit issued to the contractor. Alternatively, the contractor sought to segregate and escrow the letter of credit proceeds and declare that the creditor's security interest did not attach, or the allowance of its super-priority or general administrative expense claims.

ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of Lurgi Inc. v. Northeast Biofuels LP (Northeast Biofuels LP) Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member

Commercial opinion summary, case decided on March 21, 2009 , LexisNexis #0609-043

In re Koch

Ruling
Debtor not entitled to expense deduction for surrendered vehicles.
Procedural posture

The chapter 13 trustee objected to confirmation of the plan proposed by the debtor under 11 U.S.C.S. § 1325. The issue was whether payments on vehicles that the debtor planned to surrender as part of his chapter 13 plan could be used to reduce monthly disposable income calculated on Official Bankr. Form 22C.

ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of In re Koch Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member

Consumer opinion summary, case decided on July 25, 2008 , LexisNexis #0808-122

In re Riggins

Ruling
Confirmation denied due to debtor's failure to net out tax refund against taxes withheld on Form 22C.
Procedural posture

The chapter 13 trustee for an above-median income debtor objected pursuant to 11 U.S.C.S. § 1325 to confirmation of the plan proposed by the debtor.

ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of In re Riggins Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member

Consumer opinion summary, case decided on May 20, 2008 , LexisNexis #0808-024

In re Schneider

Ruling
Form 22C expenses are solely for calculation of monthly disposable income and should not be used to adjust Schedule I projected disposable income.
Procedural posture

Both the chapter 13 trustee and a creditor objected to confirmation of debtors' plan under 11 U.S.C.S. § 1325. At issue was whether debtors were committing all of their "projected disposable income" to make payments to unsecured creditors under the plan.

ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of In re Schneider Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member

Consumer opinion summary, case decided on April 28, 2008 , LexisNexis #0608-124

In re Lisenko

Ruling
Confirmation denied due to unplanned discrepancy between disposable income calculated on Form 22C and not income on Schedule J.
Procedural posture

The chapter 13 Trustee objected to confirmation of the debtor's proposed plan under 11 U.S.C.S. § 1325. At issue was whether the debtor was committing all of her "projected disposable income" under the plan as required by 11 U.S.C.S. § 1325(b)(1)(B) when her "monthly disposable income" as calculated on Official Bankr. Form 22C was approximately one-half the amount of her "monthly net income" reflected on Schedule J.

ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of In re Lisenko Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member

Consumer opinion summary, case decided on March 24, 2008 , LexisNexis #0508-054

In re James

Ruling
Notices of sale of tax liens containing legend required by Fair Debt Collection Practices Act did not violate stay.
Procedural posture

In separate cases, bankruptcy debtors moved for a finding that communications to the debtors from the former servicer of municipal tax liens against the debtors constituted attempts to collect prepetition debts from the debtors in violation of the automatic bankruptcy stay under 11 U.S.C. § 362(a)(5).

ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of In re James Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member

opinion summary, case decided on July 09, 2007 , LexisNexis #0907-042