Skip to main content

§ 157(b)(2)

Bavaria Yachts USA, LLLP, In re--Bavaria Yachts USA, LLLP v. Bavaria Yachtbau GmbH

Ruling
Debtor's state law claims were constitutionally non-core claims as they neither stemmed fromthe bankruptcy itself nor would necessarily be resolved as part of the allowance of creditor’sclaims. (Bankr. N.D. Ga.)
Issue(s)
Procedures; Title 11 Cases and Core Proceedings; Core Proceedings.

ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of Bavaria Yachts USA, LLLP, In re--Bavaria Yachts USA, LLLP v. Bavaria Yachtbau GmbH Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member

Commercial opinion summary, case decided on October 06, 2017 , LexisNexis #1117-088

Nick Millennium Ctr. Retail, LLC, In re

Ruling
Motion to disqualify an attorney as counsel for the claimant not warranted as it could not besaid that the matter for which the attorney represented debtor previously was "substantiallyrelated" to the claimant's claim. (Bankr. N.D. Ill.)
Issue(s)
Procedures; Title 11 Cases and Core Proceedings; Core Proceedings; Authority to Allow or Disallow Claims and Exemptions and Estimate Claims and Interests.

ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of Nick Millennium Ctr. Retail, LLC, In re Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member

Commercial opinion summary, case decided on August 04, 2017 , LexisNexis #0917-024

Hazuga, In re--Petska v. Hazuga

Ruling
Permissive abstention denied as the court had jurisdiction authority to determine whether discharge damages from a home sale was nondischargeable. (Bankr. W.D. Wis.)
Issue(s)
Procedures; Title 11 Cases and Core Proceedings; Core Proceedings; Dischargeability Proceedings.

ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of Hazuga, In re--Petska v. Hazuga Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member

Consumer opinion summary, case decided on May 11, 2017 , LexisNexis #0617-052

Cole, In re--Cole v. James B. Nutter & Co.

Ruling
Pro se chapter 13 debtors were bound by the court's order dismissing their action because they have expressly, knowingly, and voluntarily consented to the court's final adjudication. (Bankr. W.D.N.C.)
Issue(s)
Procedures; Title 11 Cases and Core Proceedings; Core Proceedings.

ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of Cole, In re--Cole v. James B. Nutter & Co. Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member

Consumer opinion summary, case decided on February 06, 2017 , LexisNexis #0317-053

Gomez v. Saenz (In re Saenz)

Ruling
Bankruptcy court had the jurisdiction and constitutional authority to enter a final judgmentliquidating a non-dischargeable state law claim. (Bankr. S.D. Tex.)
Issue(s)
Procedures; Title 11 Cases and Core Proceedings; Core Proceedings; Dischargeability Proceedings.

ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of Gomez v. Saenz (In re Saenz) Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member

Consumer opinion summary, case decided on December 19, 2016 , LexisNexis #0117-085

In re Circuit City Stores, Inc.

Ruling
Bankruptcy court had jurisdiction to block foreign subpeona of liquidating trust related toproceeding in which the trust was not a party. (Bankr. E.D. Va.)
Issue(s)
Should liquidation trust’s motion for protection from a foreign subpoena issued in connection with an action in which the liquidating trust was not a party be granted?

ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of In re Circuit City Stores, Inc. Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member

Commercial opinion summary, case decided on September 06, 2016 , LexisNexis #0916-138

In re Sandia Resorts, Inc.

Ruling
Creditor granted temporary allowance of claim to allow it to vote on debtor’s plan. (Bankr. D.N.M.)
Issue(s)
Whether preclusion principles bar debtor from successfully objecting to creditor’s claim for

ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of In re Sandia Resorts, Inc. Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member

Commercial opinion summary, case decided on September 01, 2016 , LexisNexis #0916-139

Certain Underwriters at Lloyds, Syndicates 2623/623 v. GACN, Inc. (In re GACN, Inc.)

Ruling
Bankruptcy court erred in holding that declaratory judgment action was a core proceeding.(B.A.P. 9th Cir.)
Issue(s)
For purposes of determining whether debtor's declaratory relief action was a "core" proceeding, whether the action so "inextricably connected" to the debtor-in-possession's efforts to administer its estate that the action could be said to "arise in

ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of Certain Underwriters at Lloyds, Syndicates 2623/623 v. GACN, Inc. (In re GACN, Inc.) Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member

Court :
Judge or Jurisdiction information not available
Commercial opinion summary, case decided on August 25, 2016 , LexisNexis #0916-104

Arnot v. Prodehl (In re Neel)

Ruling
Remand of state law claims denied where significant bankruptcy issues were also raised.
Issue(s)
Should four adversary proceedings based on state law be remanded to state court?

ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of Arnot v. Prodehl (In re Neel) Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member

Consumer opinion summary, case decided on June 14, 2016 , LexisNexis #0716-117

Pulsifer v. U.S. Bank N.A. (In re Pulsifer)

Ruling
Debtor's could not have dismissal of adversary proceeding vacated to request finding of facts and conclusions of for appeal.
Issue(s)
Should debtors' be granted relief from the dismissal of their adversary proceeding on grounds of excusable neglect?

ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of Pulsifer v. U.S. Bank N.A. (In re Pulsifer) Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member

Consumer opinion summary, case decided on November 02, 2015 , LexisNexis #1115-136