Skip to main content

§ 1334(c)

Jefferson Pilot Invs. Inc. v. Cottonwood Corners Phase V LLC (In re Cottonwood Corners Phase V LLC)

Ruling
Lien determination proceeding dismissed pursuant to permissive abstention due to primacy of state law issues.
Procedural posture

Defendant debtor filed a motion for abstention in plaintiff creditor's adversary proceeding to determine whether the creditor had a lien or other interests in the debtor's claim in another bankruptcy case.

ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of Jefferson Pilot Invs. Inc. v. Cottonwood Corners Phase V LLC (In re Cottonwood Corners Phase V LLC) Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member

Commercial opinion summary, case decided on November 26, 2012 , LexisNexis #1212-099

H.D. Supply Waterworks Ltd. v. Spivey (In re Construction Supervision Servs.)

Ruling
Bankruptcy court abstained from hearing complex state law action in which non-debtor parties predominated.
Procedural posture

Creditor filed a state court complaint against defendants, a chapter 11 debtor and non-debtor parties, alleging breach of contract, enforcement of lien, and quantum meruit claims. The creditor sought mandatory or permissive abstention under 28 U.S.C.S. § 1334(c), a non-debtor defendant objected.

ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of H.D. Supply Waterworks Ltd. v. Spivey (In re Construction Supervision Servs.) Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member

Commercial opinion summary, case decided on July 20, 2012 , LexisNexis #0812-101

Parmalat Capital Fin. Ltd. v. Bank of Am. Corp.

Ruling
District court erred in not exercising mandatory abstention to remand case with complex state law issues.
Procedural posture

Plaintiffs appealed from the judgments of the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York, dismissing their claims against the defendants after determining, pursuant to the mandate of the court, that mandatory abstention under 28 U.S.C.S. § 1334(c)(2) was not required in these bankruptcy-related cases.

ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of Parmalat Capital Fin. Ltd. v. Bank of Am. Corp. Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member

Court :
Judge or Jurisdiction information not available
Commercial opinion summary, case decided on February 21, 2012 , LexisNexis #0312-070

Troisio v. Erickson (In re IMMC Liquidating Estate)

Ruling
Trustee could seek withdrawal of reference to bankruptcy court on diversity grounds.
Procedural posture

Trustee of a liquidating trust for a bankruptcy debtor brought an adversary proceeding against defendants, but the bankruptcy court determined that it lacked jurisdiction over the proceeding. The trustee moved to transfer the proceeding to a district court or to allow the trustee to seek withdrawal of the bankruptcy reference.

ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of Troisio v. Erickson (In re IMMC Liquidating Estate) Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member

Commercial opinion summary, case decided on February 14, 2012 , LexisNexis #0312-102

Phoenix Energy Servs. V. Phoenix Envtl. LLC (In re Phoenix Envtl. LLC)

Ruling
Bankruptcy court abstained from hearing adversary proceeding that was related to bankruptcy but noncore as not arising under or in chapter 11 case.
Procedural posture

After creditor filed state law causes of action against defendant debtor, a writ of replevin was issued as to the debtor's property. Before the state judge ruled on a motion to dismiss the writ, the debtor filed its chapter petition and filed a notice of removal. The creditor filed a motion for remand or abstention.

ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of Phoenix Energy Servs. V. Phoenix Envtl. LLC (In re Phoenix Envtl. LLC) Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member

Commercial opinion summary, case decided on January 31, 2012 , LexisNexis #0312-064

Moyer v. Carlyle (In re Strawberry)

Ruling
Bankruptcy court abstained from hearing trustee's non-core state law-based legal malpractice action against debtor's counsel.
Procedural posture

Bankruptcy trustee brought an adversary proceeding against legal counsel alleging that counsel committed legal malpractice in representing a bankruptcy debtor. The bankruptcy court considered whether permissive abstention by the bankruptcy court was warranted under 28 U.S.C.S. § 1334(c)(1).

ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of Moyer v. Carlyle (In re Strawberry) Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member

Consumer opinion summary, case decided on January 25, 2012 , LexisNexis #0212-140

FKF Madison Group Owner LLC v. 18 E. 23rd St. Realty Co. LLC (In re FKF Madison Group Owner LLC)

Ruling
Bankruptcy court abstained from hearing adversary proceeding in which debtor had virtually no stake in the outcome.
Procedural posture

On December 29, 2011, the court issued an Order to Show Cause why it should not abstain from these adversary proceedings on a permissive basis pursuant to 28 U.S.C.S. § 1334(c)(1). The interested parties duly and thoroughly responded to the Order and the court heard argument on the issue on January 18, 2012. Plaintiff debtor as well as the non-debtor secured lender and the Committee opposed abstention.

ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of FKF Madison Group Owner LLC v. 18 E. 23rd St. Realty Co. LLC (In re FKF Madison Group Owner LLC) Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member

Commercial opinion summary, case decided on January 20, 2012 , LexisNexis #0212-069

In re FairPoint Communs. Inc.

Ruling
Bankruptcy court abstained from estimate of city's tax claim on reconsideration.
Procedural posture

Chapter 11 debtors filed a motion to estimate the maximum allowed proofs of claim pursuant to 11 U.S.C.S. § 105(a) and § 502(c) with regard to two creditors. The court entered an order that, inter alia, estimated one of the creditor's claim only in the unsecured amount of $1,062. That creditor later filed a motion to reconsider the court's order pursuant to 11 U.S.C.S. § 502(j).

ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of In re FairPoint Communs. Inc. Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member

Commercial opinion summary, case decided on January 04, 2012 , LexisNexis #0212-034

Ghannam v. Standish (In re Protan)

Ruling
Mandatory abstention did not apply to property damage dispute between debtor and former spouse pending before family court.
Procedural posture

Trustee filed an adversary proceeding in the U. S. Bankruptcy Court for the Southern District of West Virginia, Charleston Division, against defendant creditors, seeking avoidance of a property transfer and repayment of a loan made by a chapter 7 debtor to one of the creditors. The bankruptcy court invalidated a prenuptial agreement and entered judgment in favor of the trustee. The creditors appealed.

ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of Ghannam v. Standish (In re Protan) Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member

Consumer opinion summary, case decided on September 30, 2011 , LexisNexis #1011-135

Winnecour v. Taylor (In re Taylor)

Ruling
Court declined to abstain from hearing core proceeding to prevent transfer of assets.
Procedural posture

Plaintiff Trustee's adversary proceeding sought injunctive relief to prevent transfers of assets that were alleged to be property of the estate, pending the Trustee's further investigation. Movants, two defendants in the case, filed a Motion to Abstain.

ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of Winnecour v. Taylor (In re Taylor) Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member

Consumer opinion summary, case decided on February 18, 2011 , LexisNexis #0311-066