Skip to main content

§ 553

In re Reed

Ruling
Relief from stay granted to allow setoff of postpetition tax refund against tax liability.
Issue(s)
Could IRS setoff postpetition tax refund against its priority tax claim .

ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of In re Reed Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member

Consumer opinion summary, case decided on October 29, 2013 , LexisNexis #1113-091

Redmond v. IGT Inc. (In re GMJ Global Logistics Inc.)

Ruling
Shipper could offset debtor's claim for unpaid invoices against claims for breach of contract and indemnification.
Issue(s)
Whether a shipper was liable to debtor broker for invoices that the shipper did not pay where the shipper paid the debtor for prior invoices and the debtor did not pay the carriers, requiring the shipper to pay the carriers directly.

ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of Redmond v. IGT Inc. (In re GMJ Global Logistics Inc.) Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member

Commercial opinion summary, case decided on October 10, 2013 , LexisNexis #1113-062

Redmond v. IGT Inc. (In re Gmj Global Logistics Inc.)

Ruling
Claims by shipper could be setoff against claims of estate.
Issue(s)
Was shipper that checked "prepaid" on bill of lading entitled to entitled to setoff against claim by estate of debtor that contracted as carrier but actually acted as broker, contracting with other carriers to transport shipper's products.

ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of Redmond v. IGT Inc. (In re Gmj Global Logistics Inc.) Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member

Commercial opinion summary, case decided on September 24, 2013 , LexisNexis #1013-056

Tusa-Expo Holdings Inc. v. Knoll Inc.

Ruling
Preference period payments on prepetition invoices were not avoidable but prepetition receivables were avoidable as impermissible setoffs.

ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of Tusa-Expo Holdings Inc. v. Knoll Inc. Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member

Commercial opinion summary, case decided on August 05, 2013 , LexisNexis #0813-128

In re Hollis

Ruling
USDA setoff against tax refund did not violate stay given lack of notice of filing.

ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of In re Hollis Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member

Consumer opinion summary, case decided on July 30, 2013 , LexisNexis #0813-095

Morris v. U.S. Dept. of Agric. Rural Hous. Serv. (In re Morris)

Ruling
U.S. agency ordered to turn over setoff of tax refund only to extent it improved its position in preference period and after close of tax year.
Procedural posture

Plaintiff chapter 7 debtor filed a complaint against defendant, the U.S. Department of Agriculture Rural Housing Service (the agency), seeking to recover under 11 U.S.C.S. § 553(b) amounts set off by the agency. The debtor moved for summary judgment, seeking the return of the amount set off, while the United States moved for summary judgment seeking to return only $519.19 to the debtor.

ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of Morris v. U.S. Dept. of Agric. Rural Hous. Serv. (In re Morris) Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member

Consumer opinion summary, case decided on June 19, 2013 , LexisNexis #0713-058

Damas v. United States (In re Damas)

Ruling
Debtor not entitled to recover offset of Social Security payments.
Issue(s)
Were debtors entitled to recover three setoffs of Social Security disability benefits in partial satisfaction of debt owed on account of earlier benefit overpayments.

ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of Damas v. United States (In re Damas) Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member

Consumer opinion summary, case decided on January 06, 2013 , LexisNexis #0114-133

In re Farinacci

Ruling
Preference period setoff that did not improve creditor's position could not be avoided.
Procedural posture

Plaintiff chapter 7 trustee claimed that defendants improperly setoff a debt owed to them by the debtor within the 90-day preference period and also asserted that the setoff was avoidable pursuant to 11 U.S.C.S. § 553. The trustee and defendants filed cross-motions for summary judgment.

ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of In re Farinacci Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member

Consumer opinion summary, case decided on December 06, 2012 , LexisNexis #0113-056

Ries v. Legendary Marine Inc. (In re Genmar Holdings Inc.)

Ruling
Creditor not entitled to setoff against preference claim.
Procedural posture

Trustee sought summary judgment on its claim to recover a preference per 11 U.S.C.S. § 547 from defendant creditor. When defendant moved for summary judgment on claims that it was entitled to a setoff per 11 U.S.C.S. § 553 and /or to common law recoupment, plaintiff challenged the availability of either remedy.

ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of Ries v. Legendary Marine Inc. (In re Genmar Holdings Inc.) Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member

Commercial opinion summary, case decided on October 29, 2012 , LexisNexis #1112-096

Holber v. Suffolk Constr. Co. (In re Red Rock Servs. Co. LLC)

Ruling
Creditor contractor allowed setoff of prepetition debt against amount owed to debtor subcontractor.
Procedural posture

Plaintiff, chapter 7 Trustee of the bankruptcy estate of debtor subcontractor (the sub), initiated this construction litigation seeking to collect $1,667,945, plus attorneys' fees, costs and interest, from defendant prime contractor (the prime). The prime asserted certain defenses and sought a setoff of any amounts owed.

ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of Holber v. Suffolk Constr. Co. (In re Red Rock Servs. Co. LLC) Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member

Commercial opinion summary, case decided on August 30, 2012 , LexisNexis #1212-094