Skip to main content

§ 549

Mukamal v. Enriquez (In re Rx Cardiovascular Specialties Inc.)

Ruling
Contemporaneous exchange for new value and ordinary course of business defenses to avoidance are not available with respect to postpetition transfers.
Procedural posture

Plaintiff chapter 7 trustee filed an adversary proceeding against defendant creditor seeking to recover a payment and other transfers as preferences pursuant to 11 U.S.C. §§ 547 and 550. The trustees subsequently filed an amended complaint seeking avoidance and recovery of the payment as an unauthorized postpetition transfer pursuant to 11 U.S.C. § 549. The trustee filed a motion for partial summary judgment on the section 549 claim.

ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of Mukamal v. Enriquez (In re Rx Cardiovascular Specialties Inc.) Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member

opinion summary, case decided on September 15, 2006 , LexisNexis #0107-132

Brooks-Hamilton v. City of Oakland (In re Brooks-Hamilton)

Ruling
Postpetition recording of deeds from debtor to prepetition irrevocable trust was avoidable.
Procedural posture

Plaintiff debtor brought an adversary proceeding against defendant trustee in bankruptcy, and the trustee filed cross-claims. At issue was whether the debtor effectively transferred certain real property to an irrevocable trust prior to filing for bankruptcy, so that it was not property of the bankruptcy estate and could not effectively be sold by the trustee. The trustee moved for summary judgment and to dismiss the claims.

ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of Brooks-Hamilton v. City of Oakland (In re Brooks-Hamilton) Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member

opinion summary, case decided on August 25, 2006 , LexisNexis #1006-099

Miller v. NLVK LLC (In re Miller)

Ruling
Judgment was reversed and remanded to determine whether present fair equivalent value was paid for property when prior liens are considered.
Procedural posture

The District Court for the District of Nebraska granted plaintiff chapter 11 debtor's request to set aside a property transfer. Defendant purchaser appealed.

ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of Miller v. NLVK LLC (In re Miller) Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member

Court :
Judge or Jurisdiction information not available
opinion summary, case decided on July 21, 2006 , LexisNexis #0806-061

Hanrahan v. Walterman (In re Walterman Implement Inc.)

Ruling
President and sole shareholder of debtor corporation violated automatic stay by postpetition revoking debtor's subchapter S status since that status was estate property.
Procedural posture

Plaintiff chapter 7 trustee filed an action against defendant, the president and sole shareholder of debtor corporation, pursuant to 11 U.S.C. § 549 alleging that defendant revoked the debtor's subchapter S election in violation of the automatic stay. The trustee moved for summary judgment.

ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of Hanrahan v. Walterman (In re Walterman Implement Inc.) Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member

opinion summary, case decided on May 22, 2006 , LexisNexis #0606-074

Sommers v. Katy Steel Co. (In re Contractor Tech. Ltd.)

Ruling
Trustee was entitled to recover payments since transfers occurred postpetition when checks were cashed not prepetition when checks were written.
Procedural posture

Plaintiff bankruptcy trustee brought adversary proceedings against defendant subcontractors of a bankruptcy debtor, seeking turnover of alleged postpetition payments to the subcontractors under 11 U.S.C. § 549 where the subcontractors were issued checks prepetition by the debtor but the checks were cashed postpetition. The trustee and the subcontractors cross-moved for summary judgment.

ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of Sommers v. Katy Steel Co. (In re Contractor Tech. Ltd.) Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member

opinion summary, case decided on May 05, 2006 , LexisNexis #0606-097

Continental Mfg. Co. Ltd. v. Sommers (In re Contractor Tech. Ltd.)

Ruling
Transfer was deemed avoidable since check did not clear until postfiling.
Procedural posture

Appellant company sought judicial review of a decision by the Bankruptcy Court for the Southern District of Texas granting summary judgment in favor appellee bankruptcy trustee in an avoidance proceeding under 11 U.S.C. § 549.

ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of Continental Mfg. Co. Ltd. v. Sommers (In re Contractor Tech. Ltd.) Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member

opinion summary, case decided on April 26, 2006 , LexisNexis #0606-024

In re Kmart Corp.

Ruling
Court ruled that debtor payments made to critical vendors pursuant to court order, which was later reversed, were not exempted from payment recovery action.
Procedural posture

The court had previously approved plaintiff debtors'motion under 11 U.S.C. § 105(a) for authorization to pay prepetition claims of critical trade vendors (critical vendor order). The Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit reversed the critical vendor order. The debtors then filed adversary proceedings against defendants, critical vendors, to recover payments made pursuant to the order. The critical vendors moved to dismiss.

ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of In re Kmart Corp. Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member

opinion summary, case decided on April 11, 2006 , LexisNexis #0506-026

Wells v. TCF Natl Bank (In re Hi Tech Fleet Serv.)

Ruling
Court dismissed the trustee's complaint alleging avoidable transfers and demanding turnover since no provision in either the Code or case law allowed a chapter 7 trustee to bring an action challenging an asset sale consummated pursuant to court order in a chapter 11 proceeding.
Procedural posture

The matter came before the court on plaintiff chapter 7 trustee's motion for summary judgment. The trustee requested summary judgment on a two-count complaint seeking: (1) a determination of the amount, validity, and extent of defendant creditor's claim, and (2) avoidance of an allegedly unauthorized postpetition transfer of funds to the creditor.

ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of Wells v. TCF Natl Bank (In re Hi Tech Fleet Serv.) Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member

opinion summary, case decided on March 09, 2006 , LexisNexis #0306-134

Miller v. MBM Corp. (In re Ameriking Inc.)

Ruling
Trustee was denied a motion to further amend a transfer avoidance action complaint on procedural grounds and since the proposed new cause of action was barred by Code section 549(d)'s two-year limitations period.
Procedural posture

Plaintiff chapter 7 trustee filed an original complaint seeking recovery from defendant transferee of eight alleged transfers aggregating $1,222,901 under 11 U.S.C. §§ 547, 548, 502(d) and 550. The amended complaint asserted the same claims as the original complaint, but added a new two-page exhibit "B," detailing 56 apparently additional transfers totaling $4,959,980. The trustee moved for leave to file a second amended complaint.

ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of Miller v. MBM Corp. (In re Ameriking Inc.) Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member

opinion summary, case decided on March 02, 2006 , LexisNexis #0406-060

Herrington v. Grant (In re Paxton)

Ruling
Court remanded for consideration whether a trustee had a right to set aside a tax sale, whether that interest transferred to a new property owner, and whether the claim was time barred.
Procedural posture

Appellant purchasers challenged an order of the District Court for the Western District of Louisiana, which set aside a tax sale for lack of sufficient notice of the sale to appellees, co-owners one and an assignee of a mortgagee, and, as to the interest of co-owner two, for violation of an automatic stay.

ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of Herrington v. Grant (In re Paxton) Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member

Court :
Judge or Jurisdiction information not available
opinion summary, case decided on February 13, 2006 , LexisNexis #0206-117