Skip to main content

§ 523(b)

Gross, In re--New Falls Corp. v. Gross

Ruling
Claim preclusion prevented relitigating the issue of nondischargeability. (Bankr. W.D. Okla.)
Issue(s)
Exceptions to Discharge; Debt Excepted from Discharge in a Prior Bankruptcy Case.

ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of Gross, In re--New Falls Corp. v. Gross Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member

Consumer opinion summary, case decided on April 04, 2024 , LexisNexis #0624-043

In re Pacher

Ruling
Judgment of nondischargeability in prior case was controlling in subsequent bankruptcy case.
Issue(s)
How to apply debtor's prior agreed judgment of nondischargeability in this case.

ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of In re Pacher Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member

Consumer opinion summary, case decided on July 11, 2016 , LexisNexis #0816-047

Bowmanv.Biletski(InreBiletski)2016Bankr.LEXIS1071

Ruling
Debt that debtor failed to schedule in prior bankruptcy was dischargeable when properly scheduled in subsequent case.
Issue(s)
 Were judgment debts that were excepted from discharge pursuant to 11 U.S.C. § 523(a)(3) in the  debtor's prior bankruptcy case dischargeable in debtor's subsequent case? 

ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of Bowmanv.Biletski(InreBiletski)2016Bankr.LEXIS1071 Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member

Court :
Judge or Jurisdiction information not available
Consumer opinion summary, case decided on April 25, 2016 , LexisNexis #0416-126

Davis v. Voncannon (In re Voncannon)

Ruling
Debtor not entitled to redetermination of dischargeability.
Issue(s)
Whether debtor remains liable on a consent judgment entered in debtor's previous bankruptcy and whether the judgment remains non-dischargeable for purposes of the current bankruptcy?

ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of Davis v. Voncannon (In re Voncannon) Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member

Consumer opinion summary, case decided on February 05, 2015 , LexisNexis #0316-057

Daniels v. Agin

Ruling
Profit sharing plan properly held non-exempt due to violations of tax laws.
Issue(s)
Was debtor's profit sharing plan properly held to be nonexempt due to noncompliance with applicable tax laws?

ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of Daniels v. Agin Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member

Court :
Judge or Jurisdiction information not available
Consumer opinion summary, case decided on November 25, 2013 , LexisNexis #1213-085

In re Garrett

Ruling
Section 522(b)(3)(A) preempts state law residency requirement for exemptions.
Procedural posture

In this chapter 7 case, the joint debtors claimed that certain property, currently located in Texas, was exempted from the bankruptcy estate under North Carolina's homestead exemption laws.

ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of In re Garrett Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member

Consumer opinion summary, case decided on March 31, 2010 , LexisNexis #0710-019