Skip to main content

§ 523(a)(3)

Bellavia v. Simonetti (In re Bellavia)

Ruling
Unsecured debt in "no asset" case of which creditor did not receive notice was not excepted from discharge.
Procedural posture

Plaintiff debtors filed for relief under chapter 7. The debtors filed an amended complaint to determine the dischargeability of a debt owed to defendant creditor. The court held a hearing and issued findings of fact and conclusions of law.

ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of Bellavia v. Simonetti (In re Bellavia) Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member

opinion summary, case decided on July 18, 2007 , LexisNexis #0907-028

Federal Ins. Co. v. Baumgardner (In re Baumgardner)

Ruling
Claim based on debtor's fraudulent conduct not listed in schedules was held nondischargeable post-discharge as creditor did not have notice of filing.
Procedural posture

Plaintiff creditors filed an uncontested motion for summary judgment on their adversary proceeding, which sought a determination that defendant debtor's debt to them for fraudulent conduct was excepted from his discharge under 11 U.S.C. § 523(a)(3).

ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of Federal Ins. Co. v. Baumgardner (In re Baumgardner) Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member

opinion summary, case decided on June 11, 2007 , LexisNexis #0707-095

In re Damiano

Ruling
Late-filed proof of claim of the debtor's mother was disallowed since the mother had actual knowledge of the case in time to timely file and another creditor objected to the mother's motion to deem the filing timely.
Procedural posture

Movant, the mother of a debtor, sought an order allowing her late-filed proof of claim in her daughter's chapter 7 bankruptcy case under Fed. R. Bankr. P. 3002. A creditor opposed the motion.

ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of In re Damiano Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member

opinion summary, case decided on December 13, 2005 , LexisNexis #0306-020

In re Jenkins

Ruling
Creditor was denied motion to reopen bankruptcy case but only because the creditor was not listed as a creditor and could pursue a separate nondischargeability proceeding regarding damages claim at any time.
Procedural posture

Moving creditor sought to reopen a bankruptcy case to permit filing a motion to modify or amend the order of discharge and for relief from the discharge injunction, so the creditor could bring a claim against the debtor for the unauthorized use and conversion of the creditor's house boat in the Circuit Court for Knox County, Tennessee.

ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of In re Jenkins Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member

opinion summary, case decided on August 16, 2005 , LexisNexis #0106-084