Skip to main content

§ 362(c)

In re Frazier

Ruling
Foreclosure creditor was denied a motion for reconsideration of an order imposing a stay since the debtor's most recent filing was made in good faith and the creditor had received notice of a hearing on the stay.
Procedural posture

A debtor filed a bankruptcy petition after her prior bankruptcy cases were dismissed, and the debtor sought a bankruptcy stay to preclude an impending foreclosure proceeding against the debtor's property. The foreclosing creditor moved for reconsideration of the bankruptcy court's order which granted the debtor's emergency motion to impose the stay.

ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of In re Frazier Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member

opinion summary, case decided on March 17, 2006 , LexisNexis #0406-004

In re Beasley

Ruling
Court ruled that Code section 362(c)(4)(B) for imposing an automatic stay in a subsequent filing applied both to debtors with only one other case within the prior year and those with more than one case.
Procedural posture

The debtor previously filed bankruptcy under chapter 13 on April 25, 2005. That case was dismissed on December 14, 2005. The debtor then filed for bankruptcy again under chapter 13 on January 4, 2006. Before the court was the debtor's motion to impose the automatic stay.

ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of In re Beasley Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member

opinion summary, case decided on March 16, 2006 , LexisNexis #0306-110

In re Evans

Ruling
Court extended automatic stay since debtors overcame presumption that case was not filed in good faith.
Procedural posture

Petitioner debtors filed a motion to extend the automatic stay as to all creditors, pursuant to 11 U.S.C. § 362(c)(3)(B). Respondent trustee filed a reply.

ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of In re Evans Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member

opinion summary, case decided on March 14, 2006 , LexisNexis #0706-004

Wood v. United States (In re Wood)

Ruling
IRS's postpetition efforts to collect prepetition debts did not violate automatic stay since the stay was lifted when the debtor received a discharge and the income tax deficiencies were exempted from discharge.
Procedural posture

Plaintiff debtor sought relief against defendant IRS for the IRS's postpetition efforts to collect debtor's prepetition tax deficiencies, asserting that the IRS violated the court's order confirming debtor's plan and the automatic stay, and filed an alleged false proof of claim. Debtor sought actual and punitive damages, and sanctions against the IRS, which moved to dismiss the complaint.

ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of Wood v. United States (In re Wood) Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member

opinion summary, case decided on March 02, 2006 , LexisNexis #0506-009

In re Ziolkowski

Ruling
Debtors were denied an extension of the automatic stay since a hearing was not timely scheduled by the clerk's office and the debtors did not insure that a motion to extend an automatic stay was timely scheduled.
Procedural posture

Debtors filed for chapter 13 bankruptcy protection. They then moved to continue and extend the automatic stay pursuant to 11 U.S.C. § 362(c)(3)(B).

ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of In re Ziolkowski Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member

opinion summary, case decided on February 27, 2006 , LexisNexis #0306-072

In re Ellis

Ruling
Debtor was denied a continuation of the bankruptcy stay in a second filing since the debtor had not overcome the presumption of filing in bad faith.
Procedural posture

Movant chapter 13 debtor sought to continue the automatic stay beyond the 30-day period. Respondent mortgage holder and trustee objected. The bankruptcy court held an evidentiary hearing.

ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of In re Ellis Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member

opinion summary, case decided on February 24, 2006 , LexisNexis #0306-109

In re Williams

Ruling
Debtor's motion to extend automatic stay was granted due to substantial change in circumstances.
Procedural posture

The debtor, proceeding under chapter 13, filed a motion to extend the period for the automatic stay, pursuant to 11 U.S.C. § 362(c)(3)(B). The trustee filed a response to the motion.

ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of In re Williams Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member

opinion summary, case decided on February 24, 2006 , LexisNexis #0706-005

In re Cartledge

Ruling
Debtors were denied a motion to extend the automatic stay since they failed to follow local bankruptcy rules and since no hearing occurred before the expiration of the stay.
Procedural posture

The debtors had a bankruptcy proceeding pending within one year of the current case. In the current case, filed under chapter 13, the debtors sought a motion to extend the automatic stay beyond the 30-day period, pursuant to 11 U.S.C. § 362(c)(3)(B).

ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of In re Cartledge Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member

opinion summary, case decided on February 16, 2006 , LexisNexis #0306-038

In re Ball

Ruling
Debtors were granted automatic stay extension for chapter 13 case filed shortly after chapter 7 discharge since the debtors appeared to be acting in good faith to address the mortgage debt.
Procedural posture

The debtors initiated a proceeding for relief under chapter 13. The debtors had filed two earlier petitions for relief under chapter 13 and under chapter 7, and the debtors had received a chapter 7 discharge in October 2005. The debtors filed a motion to extend the automatic stay, pursuant to 11 U.S.C. § 362(c)(3)(B), the creditor objected to the extension.

ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of In re Ball Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member

opinion summary, case decided on January 25, 2006 , LexisNexis #0206-026

In re Mark

Ruling
Debtor was granted a motion to extend an automatic stay from prior filing since the debtor demonstrated good faith in new filing.
Procedural posture

Debtor individual filed for chapter 13 bankruptcy protection. Debtor then moved to extend the automatic stay pursuant to 11 U.S.C. § 362(c)(3)(B). The bankruptcy court held a hearing on the motion.

ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of In re Mark Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member

opinion summary, case decided on January 23, 2006 , LexisNexis #0206-056