Skip to main content

§ 362(b)(4)

In re McOuat

Ruling
Government claims under the False Claims Act were excepted from the automatic stay. (Bankr. E.D.N.C.)
Issue(s)
Automatic Stay; Exceptions; Governmental Unit's Enforcement of Police or Regulatory

ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of In re McOuat Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member

Consumer opinion summary, case decided on October 13, 2016 , LexisNexis #1116-038

SEC v. Miller

Ruling
Asset freeze in SEC enforcement action did not violate the automatic stay.
Issue(s)
Whether an asset freeze order obtained by the Securities and Exchange Commission constituted an action to collect on an anticipated money judgment and violated the automatic stay?

ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of SEC v. Miller Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member

Court :
Judge or Jurisdiction information not available
Commercial opinion summary, case decided on December 18, 2015 , LexisNexis #0116-041

In re MA Salazar Inc.

Ruling
Village's action in demolishing an unsafe structure on debtor's property was taken in the exercise of its police and regulatory powers and did not violate stay.
Issue(s)
Should village be held in contempt for demolishing allegedly unsafe structure on debtor's property without consulting the bankruptcy court regarding the applicability of the automatic stay?

ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of In re MA Salazar Inc. Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member

Commercial opinion summary, case decided on December 08, 2014 , LexisNexis #0115-039

In re Guardin

Ruling
Complaint and prosecution up to judgment under state unfair trade practices act was not subject to stay.
Issue(s)
Whether the State of Florida, office of the Attorney General, was entitled to an order declaring that the automatic stay was inapplicable to its action seeking to add debtor husband as an additional defendant in a complaint pending against others in state court alleging violations of Florida's Deceptive and Unfair Trade Practices Act (FDUTPA).

ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of In re Guardin Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member

Consumer opinion summary, case decided on November 24, 2014 , LexisNexis #1214-074

In re Duval at Gulf Harbors LLC

Ruling
Criminal forfeiture proceedings were exempt from the automatic stay.
Issue(s)
Was criminal forfeiture subject to the automatic stay?

ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of In re Duval at Gulf Harbors LLC Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member

Commercial opinion summary, case decided on September 18, 2014 , LexisNexis #1014-078

Comcast Cable Communs. Mgmt. LLC v. Chintella (In re Chintella)

Ruling
Sanctions motion serving interests of one party violated stay.
Issue(s)
Did creditor's motion for sanctions against the debtor in an unrelated district court case violate the automatic stay?

ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of Comcast Cable Communs. Mgmt. LLC v. Chintella (In re Chintella) Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member

Consumer opinion summary, case decided on June 20, 2014 , LexisNexis #0814-115

Solis v. Wallis

Ruling
ERISA action was excepted from stay under pecuniary purpose and public policy exceptions.
Procedural posture

In an action by plaintiff, the Secretary of Labor for the U.S. Department of Labor (Secretary), alleging that defendants, including an involuntary debtor, violated the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974, 29 U.S.C.S. § 1001 et seq., the Secretary filed a motion pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 59(e) to reconsider the court's sua sponte dismissal of one of the defendants. Two of the defendants filed a pro se motion to dismiss the Secretary's action.

ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of Solis v. Wallis Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member

Consumer opinion summary, case decided on August 30, 2012 , LexisNexis #1012-009

In re Halo Wireless v. Alenco Communs. Inc. (In re Halo Wireless Inc.)

Ruling
Public utilities commission suits were excepted from stay as actions by governmental units in furtherance of regulatory or police powers.
Procedural posture

Debtor, a small cellular company, filed a voluntary chapter 11 petition, removed state court suits filed against it by local phone companies, and sought to have them and state public utilities' commissions' (PUC) actions transferred to the United States Bankruptcy Court for the Eastern District of Texas, which ordered the suits remanded and found the PUC actions excepted from the automatic stay under § 362(b)(4). Debtor appealed.

ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of In re Halo Wireless v. Alenco Communs. Inc. (In re Halo Wireless Inc.) Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member

Court :
Judge or Jurisdiction information not available
Commercial opinion summary, case decided on June 18, 2012 , LexisNexis #0712-040

In re B.Y.O.B. Inc.

Ruling
Proceedings concerning state regulation of alcoholic beverages were not subject to stay pursuant to police and regulatory powers exception.
Procedural posture

The Montana Department of Revenue (DOR) filed a motion seeking a determination that pending state court actions involving the DOR and a chapter 11 debtor and the DOR's administrative enforcement actions against the debtor based on the DOR's regulation of alcoholic beverages in Montana were exempt from the automatic stay pursuant to 11 U.S.C.S. § 362(b)(4) under the DOR's police and regulatory power.

ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of In re B.Y.O.B. Inc. Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member

Commercial opinion summary, case decided on February 17, 2012 , LexisNexis #0312-039

In re Clifton

Ruling
Secretary of Labor's complaint regarding debtor's ERISA violations was within police and regulatory powers exception to stay.
Procedural posture

Debtor filed a motion to show cause why the automatic stay provision of 11 U.S.C.S. § 362(a) had not been violated by the Secretary of Labor due to a complaint filed by the Secretary against the debtor in federal court. Debtor also filed a motion seeking an injunction and sanctions against the Secretary.

ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of In re Clifton Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member

Consumer opinion summary, case decided on August 03, 2010 , LexisNexis #0910-107