Skip to main content

§ 327

United States v. Krause (In re Krause)

Ruling
Payment of fees for debtor's counsel as special counsel to United States Trustee from frozen assets denied.
Procedural posture

Debtor moved for the payment of the professional fees of his counsel as special counsel to the U.S. trustee, to be paid from frozen funds that either belonged to the estate or various trusts and other entities. The court conditioned any such payment upon a requirement that debtor to make full disclosure of all potential estate assets. A second defendant also sought payment for his counsel.

ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of United States v. Krause (In re Krause) Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member

opinion summary, case decided on August 08, 2006 , LexisNexis #1006-004

Magten Asset. Mgmt. Corp. v. Paul Hastings Janofsky & Walker LLP (In re Northwestern Corp.)

Ruling
Court affirmed order denying motion for attorney disqualification since potential conflict of interest was not per se disqualification.
Procedural posture

Appellant creditor sought review of an order issued by the bankruptcy court, denying the creditor's motion to disqualify appellee, the debtor's counsel.

ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of Magten Asset. Mgmt. Corp. v. Paul Hastings Janofsky & Walker LLP (In re Northwestern Corp.) Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member

opinion summary, case decided on July 17, 2006 , LexisNexis #0806-048

Banner v. Cohen Estis & Assocs. LLP (In re Balco Ltd.)

Ruling
On reconsideration, disgorgement of attorneys' fees upheld where firm failed to disclose conflict of interest.
Procedural posture

Plaintiff bankruptcy trustee brought an adversary proceeding against defendant law firm which represented bankruptcy debtors in consolidated cases, seeking disgorgement of the firm's retainer based on lack of disclosures under 11 U.S.C. § 327 and Fed. R. Bankr. P. 2014. The firm moved for reconsideration of the order which directed the firm to disgorge the retainer and denied the firm's fee application.

ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of Banner v. Cohen Estis & Assocs. LLP (In re Balco Ltd.) Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member

opinion summary, case decided on July 07, 2006 , LexisNexis #0906-119

In re Frascella Enters.

Ruling
Debtor's application to hire counsel denied due to failure to completely disclose prior relationship with law firm.
Procedural posture

After the debtor filed for chapter 11 bankruptcy, the debtor filed an application to hire a certain law firm as counsel pursuant to 11 U.S.C. § 327(a), the unsecured creditors objected.

ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of In re Frascella Enters. Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member

opinion summary, case decided on April 12, 2006 , LexisNexis #0906-038

In re WDS Inc.

Ruling
Debtor's motion to alter an order granting turnover to a trustee of the debtor's counsel's retainer and related motions were denied since the counsel had not filed an application for employment and the debtor did not show extraordinary circumstances for why the application was not filed.
Procedural posture

The debtor initially filed for relief under chapter 11, and the matter was converted to a chapter 7 proceeding. The debtor filed a motion to alter or amend the court's earlier turnover orders related to attorney's fees, to approve the attorney's application for employment, nunc pro tunc, and the application to employ debtor's attorney for the estate.

ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of In re WDS Inc. Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member

opinion summary, case decided on January 17, 2006 , LexisNexis #0306-011

Bennett & Fairshter LLP v. Stinky Love Inc. (In re Lacy)

Ruling
Order disallowing attorneys' fees was affirmed since the law firm's postpetition, preconfirmation employment had not been authorized.
Procedural posture

Appellant law firm challenged an order and judgment from the bankruptcy court, which granted a motion by appellee creditor to implement the debtor's confirmed plan of reorganization, pursuant to 11 U.S.C. § 1142, disallowed the law firm's claim for attorneys'fees for postpetition, preconfirmation employment by the debtor.

ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of Bennett & Fairshter LLP v. Stinky Love Inc. (In re Lacy) Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member

Court :
Judge or Jurisdiction information not available
opinion summary, case decided on January 06, 2006 , LexisNexis #0106-108

In re Great Lakes Factors Inc.

Ruling
Trustee's motion to employ special counsel was granted over objections since the special counsel qualified as a disinterested professional and the intended use of special counsel did not appear to harm estate assets or to raise res judicata issues as claimed.
Procedural posture

The trustee filed a motion pursuant to 11 U.S.C. § 327(a) to employ special legal counsel to represent the trustee on behalf of the estate for the pursuit of certain tort and/or contract claims that was anticipated would have the effect of enlarging the estate of the debtor. The banking company and the court-appointed receiver filed objections to the appointment of the special counsel.

ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of In re Great Lakes Factors Inc. Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member

opinion summary, case decided on December 19, 2005 , LexisNexis #0206-065

In re Penney

Ruling
Court denied a trustee's application to employ counsel due to an actual conflict of interest in counsel representing a creditor and the estate.
Procedural posture

The chapter 7 trustee filed an application to employ counsel. Proposed counsel and his firm represented a secured creditor with a claim against the bankruptcy estate. The issue was whether an actual conflict of interest existed with respect to counsel's dual representation of the creditor and the estate.

ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of In re Penney Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member

opinion summary, case decided on September 26, 2005 , LexisNexis #0406-041