Skip to main content

§ 1327

Sallie Mae Servicing Corp. v. Ransom (In re Ransom)

Ruling
Panel rejected that a confirmed plan could preclude a student loan lender from recovering postpetition interest on a student loan debt and thus discharge the interest obligation without conducting an undue hardship hearing.
Procedural posture

Appellant, a student loan lender, sought review of a decision of the bankruptcy court, which determined that appellee debtor was not obligated under the confirmed chapter 13 plan to pay accrued interest charged by the lender as part of her student loan obligation.

ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of Sallie Mae Servicing Corp. v. Ransom (In re Ransom) Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member

Court :
Judge or Jurisdiction information not available
opinion summary, case decided on December 27, 2005 , LexisNexis #0206-022

In re Perry

Ruling
Debtor was denied motion to avoid a lien since the debtor did not give the creditor sufficient notice of an intent to cramdown the creditor's interest in the chapter 13 plan.
Procedural posture

A chapter 13 matter came before the court upon movant debtor's Motion to Avoid Lien, and non-movant lienholder's opposition thereto.

ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of In re Perry Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member

opinion summary, case decided on December 14, 2005 , LexisNexis #0206-049