Skip to main content

§ 1129(b)(2)

In re Lively

Ruling
Absolute priority rule applies to individual chapter 11 debtors.
Procedural posture

The denial of confirmation of appellant individual chapter 11 debtor's reorganization plan was certified for appeal from the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Southern District of Texas to resolve whether chapter 11's absolute priority rule in 11 U.S.C.S. § 1129(b)(2)(B), applied in such individual debtor cases.

ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of In re Lively Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member

Court :
Judge or Jurisdiction information not available
Consumer opinion summary, case decided on May 29, 2013 , LexisNexis #0613-100

In re ONeal

Ruling
Confirmation denied due to impossibility and lack of specificity or good faith.
Procedural posture

The Arkansas Development Finance Authority (ADFA) objected to confirmation of the debtors second amended chapter 11 plan of reorganization on the grounds that the plan did not comply with the requirements of 11 U.S.C.S. §§ 1122 and 1129(a). It also argued that the plan violated the absolute priority rule in 11 U.S.C.S. § 1129(b)(2)(B)(ii).

ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of In re ONeal Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member

Consumer opinion summary, case decided on April 12, 2013 , LexisNexis #0513-030

In re Lee Min Ho Chen

Ruling
Confirmation of debtor's second amended plan denied due to failure to satisfy absolute priority rule.
Procedural posture

The proceeding before the court was a creditor's Opposition to Second Amended Plan of Reorganization (SAP) and debtor's Reply thereto.

ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of In re Lee Min Ho Chen Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member

Consumer opinion summary, case decided on November 09, 2012 , LexisNexis #1212-026

In re Sea Trail Corp.

Ruling
Plan featuring separate classification of classes of unsecured creditors with different, contradictory interests, could be confirmed.
Procedural posture

Chapter 11 debtor, the owner of a golf resort facility, submitted its first amended plan of reorganization for a hearing on confirmation. Objections to confirmation were filed by the bankruptcy administrator and the unsecured creditor's committee, challenging the plan's compliance absolute priority rule set forth in 11 U.S.C.S. § 1129(b)(2)(B), the treatment of the unsecured classes, respectively.

ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of In re Sea Trail Corp. Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member

Commercial opinion summary, case decided on October 23, 2012 , LexisNexis #1112-061

In Ralph Roberts Realty LLC

Ruling
Confirmation of third amended plan denied due to clear violation of absolute priority rule.
Procedural posture

The jointly administered chapter 11 debtors sought confirmation of their third amended plan. Objections to confirmation were made by the official committee of unsecured creditors (the committee) and by a group of unsecured creditors (the 2007 creditors).

ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of In Ralph Roberts Realty LLC Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member

Commercial opinion summary, case decided on October 19, 2012 , LexisNexis #1112-098

In re Root

Ruling
Confirmation denied due to debtors' failure to establish that plan was fair and equitable to impaired claims.
Procedural posture

Chapter 11 debtors in possession filed an amended chapter 11 plan of reorganization (the Plan) and sought confirmation.

ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of In re Root Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member

Consumer opinion summary, case decided on October 19, 2012 , LexisNexis #1112-097

In re Carolina Industries Ltd.

Ruling
Debtor's motion for postpetition distribution to shareholders denied.
Procedural posture

Debtor corporation filed a petition under chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy Code and sought permission to make a postpetition distribution in the amount of $44,578 to its shareholders to pay the personal tax liabilities the shareholders had to the North Carolina Department of Revenue ("NCDOR"). A committee of unsecured creditors and a judgment creditor filed objections to the debtor's motion.

ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of In re Carolina Industries Ltd. Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member

Commercial opinion summary, case decided on July 11, 2012 , LexisNexis #0812-030

Mahraj v. Stubbs & Perdue P.A. (In re Mahraj)

Ruling
BAPCPA did not repeal the absolute priority rule for individual chapter 11 debtors.
Procedural posture

The U. S. Bankruptcy Court for the Eastern District of Virginia entered an order denying confirmation of the debtors' reorganization plan. Debtors noted a timely appeal. On its own motion, the bankruptcy court certified its order for direct appeal to the appellate court pursuant to 28 U.S.C.S. § 158(d)(2)(A)(i). A panel of the appellate court then authorized debtors' direct appeal.

ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of Mahraj v. Stubbs & Perdue P.A. (In re Mahraj) Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member

Court :
Judge or Jurisdiction information not available
Consumer opinion summary, case decided on June 14, 2012 , LexisNexis #0712-033

RadLAX Gateway Hotel LLC v. Amalgamated Bank

Ruling
Plan that stripped a secured creditor of its right to credit bid at a sale of its collateral could not be confirmed.
Procedural posture

A bankruptcy court denied petitioner debtors' request to confirm a "cramdown" bankruptcy plan over respondent lienholder bank's objection, finding that a proposed auction to sell the encumbered asset free and clear of a lien without permitting the bank to credit-bid did not comply with 11 U.S.C.S. § 1129(b)(2)(A)'s requirements for cramdown plans. The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit affirmed. Certiorari was granted.

ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of RadLAX Gateway Hotel LLC v. Amalgamated Bank Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member

Commercial opinion summary, case decided on May 29, 2012 , LexisNexis #0612-062

In re Kamayan Holdings LLC

Ruling
Plan confirmed over objection where rate paid to creditor exceeded discount cramdown rate and end value would exceed value of creditor's claim.
Procedural posture

Before the court for consideration of confirmation was debtor's plan of reorganization. Debtor's secured creditor objected to the plan.

ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of In re Kamayan Holdings LLC Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member

Commercial opinion summary, case decided on May 23, 2012 , LexisNexis #0612-063