Skip to main content

§ 109(h)(1)

In re Jones

Ruling
Waiver of credit counseling requirement denied where debtors failed to file information regarding exigent circumstances.
Procedural posture

One of the debtors asked the court to waive the requirement of pre-petition credit counseling under 11 U.S.C.S. § 109(h)(1). her husband and joint debtor did not file a certificate demonstrating completion of credit counseling or a certification, of any kind, attempting to set forth facts that might havejustified a waiver of that requirement.

ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of In re Jones Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member

Consumer opinion summary, case decided on October 01, 2007 , LexisNexis #0308-075

In re Enloe

Ruling
Sanctions against debtors'counsel, rather than dismissal of case, appropriate where debtors'credit counseling was obtained 189 days prepetition.
Procedural posture

United States Trustee filed a motion to dismiss chapter 7 debtors'case for failure to comply with the credit counseling requirement of 11 U.S.C. § 109(h)(1).

ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of In re Enloe Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member

Consumer opinion summary, case decided on August 23, 2007 , LexisNexis #1007-037

In re Falcone

Ruling
Case dismissed where debtor requested temporary waiver and received credit counseling two weeks after petition date for failure to make sufficient effort to comply prepetition.
Procedural posture

A debtor filed a petition under chapter 13, and a corporation filed a motion to dismiss the petition, claiming that the debtor failed to comply with 11 U.S.C. § 109.

ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of In re Falcone Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member

opinion summary, case decided on May 31, 2007 , LexisNexis #0807-004

In re Ellis

Ruling
Case dismissed where debtors received credit counseling prior to dismissed chapter 13 case and after chapter 7 petition date but not within 180 days prior to the chapter 7 petition.
Procedural posture

The debtors filed for relief under chapter 7. The United States Trustee sought to dismiss the case, pursuant to 11 U.S.C. §§ 109(h)(1), 521(b) and 707(a) for the debtors'failure to obtain credit counseling within 180 days prior to the petition filing date, and the debtors'failure to file the proper credit counseling certificates.

ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of In re Ellis Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member

opinion summary, case decided on May 17, 2007 , LexisNexis #0907-036

In re Coard

Ruling
Credit counseling received 198 days prior to filing did not satisfy requirement.
Procedural posture

The debtor filed for bankruptcy relief under chapter 7. The United States Trustee filed a motion, pursuant to 11 U.S.C. §§ 109(h)(1), 521(b) and 707(a) to dismiss the case due to the debtor's failure to obtain credit counseling within 180 days prior to the petition filing date.

ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of In re Coard Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member

opinion summary, case decided on May 16, 2007 , LexisNexis #0907-037

In re Ruckdaschel

Ruling
Case dismissed as filed 187 days after debtors received credit counseling due to delay in obtaining signature of incarcerated debtor due to prison rules.
Procedural posture

The United States Trustee filed a motion to dismiss debtors'chapter 13 case, alleging that debtors were not eligible for bankruptcy relief because they had not completed credit counseling within the 180 days preceding the filing of their petition as required by 11 U.S.C. § 109(h)(1).

ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of In re Ruckdaschel Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member

opinion summary, case decided on March 20, 2007 , LexisNexis #0507-072

Clippard v. Bass

Ruling
Extension of time to comply with credit counseling requirement reversed and case dismissed due to lack of exigent circumstances.
Procedural posture

Appellant United States Trustee sought review of an order from the bankruptcy court, which granted appellee chapter 7 debtor's motion to extend time for the credit counseling required under 11 U.S.C. § 109(h)(1) and which denied the trustee's motion to dismiss the debtor's bankruptcy case.

ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of Clippard v. Bass Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member

opinion summary, case decided on March 13, 2007 , LexisNexis #0507-037

In re Nichols

Ruling
Bankruptcy court had authority to excuse compliance with credit counseling requirement in appropriate cases.
Procedural posture

Citing 11 U.S.C. § 109(h), 11 U.S.C. § 521(b), 11 U.S.C. § 707(a), the U.S. trustee asked the court to dismiss two chapter 7 petitions filed by unrelated debtors based on a claim that debtors in each case failed to comply with the credit counseling requirement in 11 U.S.C. § 109(h)(1). At issue was whether the court had express or implied power to excuse such noncompliance.

ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of In re Nichols Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member

opinion summary, case decided on February 09, 2007 , LexisNexis #0307-107

In re Kernan

Ruling
Debtor given wrong services by credit counseling service satisfied requirement by obtaining proper counseling immediately postpetition.
Procedural posture

The United States trustee ("UST") has moved to dismiss the debtor's chapter 7 case because the debtor did not timely satisfy the prepetition duties required by the Bankruptcy Abuse Prevention and Consumer Protection Act of 2005 ("BAPCPA"). Specifically, the UST argued that the debtor did not properly comply with the credit counseling requirement in 11 U.S.C. § 109(h)(1).

ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of In re Kernan Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member

opinion summary, case decided on January 05, 2007 , LexisNexis #0207-071

In re Swanson

Ruling
Credit briefing received on the morning of petition date prior to filing satisfied the counseling requirement.
Procedural posture

The chapter 13 trustee objected to the debtor's eligibility to be a debtor under 11 U.S.C. § 109(h). The Trustee noted that the certificate of credit counseling filed by the debtor showed that he received a credit briefing at 8:28 a.m. on the day his petition was filed. The issue was whether such a "same day" briefing satisfied the section 109(h) requirement that the credit briefing be received "preceding the date of filing the petition."

ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of In re Swanson Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member

opinion summary, case decided on December 21, 2006 , LexisNexis #0207-072