Skip to main content

§ 101

In re Andrews

Ruling
Fee awarded to attorney for debtor's former spouse in divorce was a nondischargeable domestic support obligation.
Procedural posture

Debtor filed a petition under chapter 13, and an attorney who represented the debtor's ex-wife in a divorce action filed a claim against the debtor's bankruptcy estate. The debtor filed an objection to the attorney's claim, and the attorney filed an objection to confirmation of the debtor's chapter 13 plan and moved for judgment on the pleadings.

ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of In re Andrews Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member

Consumer opinion summary, case decided on July 12, 2010 , LexisNexis #1010-002

In re Winkles

Ruling
Unemployment compensation funds are not SSA payments and must be included in current monthly income calculation.
Procedural posture

The United States Trustee (UST) filed a motion to dismiss the chapter 7 debtors' case pursuant to 11 U.S.C.S. § 707(b)(1) and (b)(2). The sole issue was whether unemployment compensation benefits received from the State of Illinois prior to filing bankruptcy were benefits received under the Social Security Act (SSA) and therefore excluded from the current monthly income calculation under 11 U.S.C.S. § 101(10A)(B).

ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of In re Winkles Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member

Consumer opinion summary, case decided on July 06, 2010 , LexisNexis #1010-001

In re Bartelini

Ruling
Social Security income properly excluded from debtor's income calculations.
Procedural posture

Debtors filed separate petitions under chapter 13, and a trustee was appointed to administer their bankruptcy estates. The trustee filed objections to plans the debtors proposed for repaying their creditors, claiming that the plans could not be confirmed under 11 U.S.C.S. § 1325(b)(1)(B) because the debtors had not committed all of their projected disposable income to repay debts they owed to unsecured creditors.

ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of In re Bartelini Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member

Consumer opinion summary, case decided on June 02, 2010 , LexisNexis #0910-001

In re Nance

Ruling
Unemployment compensation required to be included in current monthly income calculation.
Procedural posture

This matter came before the court on the Chapter 13 Trustee's Amended Objection to Confirmation of Debtors' Amended Plan.

ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of In re Nance Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member

Consumer opinion summary, case decided on May 21, 2010 , LexisNexis #0810-106

In re Bowen

Ruling
Enforcement of domestic support obligation was not subject to stay.
Procedural posture

The former spouse of a bankruptcy debtor asserted that a state-court award to the spouse of a percentage of the debtor's retirement benefits was a domestic support obligation which was not dischargeable. The spouse moved for relief from the automatic bankruptcy stay to allow the spouse to obtain a qualified domestic relations order from the state court.

ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of In re Bowen Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member

Consumer opinion summary, case decided on May 10, 2010 , LexisNexis #0810-037

In re Olguin

Ruling
Social security benefits contributed to household by non-debtor grandparents needed to be included in calculation of current monthly income.
Procedural posture

Before the court was the Standing Chapter 13 Trustee's Objection to Confirmation of debtors' chapter 13 Plan.

ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of In re Olguin Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member

Consumer opinion summary, case decided on April 29, 2010 , LexisNexis #0810-036

In re Wyatt & McAlister PLLC

Ruling
Case dismissed where both members of PLLC did not join in petition.
Procedural posture

Following the filing of a voluntary chapter 7 case on behalf of debtor, a professional limited liability company (PLLC), by one of its members, the other member of the PLLC filed an emergency motion to dismiss the chapter 7 voluntary petition.

ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of In re Wyatt & McAlister PLLC Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member

Commercial opinion summary, case decided on April 23, 2010 , LexisNexis #0710-106

In re Scholl

Ruling
Railroad Retirement Act benefits should not be included in current monthly income calculation.
Procedural posture

Before the court was an objection by the chapter 13 trustee to confirmation of a chapter 13 plan filed by debtors.

ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of In re Scholl Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member

Consumer opinion summary, case decided on March 31, 2010 , LexisNexis #0610-036

Pellegrino v. Boyajian (In re Pellegrino)

Ruling
Case properly dismissed as debtors with negative income did not qualify under chapter 13.
Procedural posture

The below median debtors appealed from an order of the bankruptcy court for the District of Rhode Island that dismissed their chapter 13 case where the court concluded that the debtors did not have excess income from which to make plan payments, and were therefore not eligible for chapter 13 relief as contemplated by 11 U.S.C.S. § 101(30), did not meet the requirements of 11 U.S.C.S. § 1325(b)(1).

ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of Pellegrino v. Boyajian (In re Pellegrino) Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member

Court :
Judge or Jurisdiction information not available
Consumer opinion summary, case decided on February 09, 2010 , LexisNexis #0410-001

Raymond Profl Group Inc. v. William A. Pope Co. (In re Raymond Profl Group Inc.)

Ruling
Debtor in possession's counsel disqualified due to actual conflict of interest.
Procedural posture

Plaintiff bankruptcy debtors, a contractor and its sole corporate shareholder, brought an adversary proceeding against defendant subcontractor in a dispute concerning funds from a construction project. The subcontractor moved to disqualify the debtor's counsel and to appoint a chapter 11 trustee, and the shareholder moved for voluntary dismissal without prejudice of its claim to ownership of a project account.

ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of Raymond Profl Group Inc. v. William A. Pope Co. (In re Raymond Profl Group Inc.) Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member

Commercial opinion summary, case decided on December 17, 2009 , LexisNexis #0110-037