Skip to main content

Page Banner(Taxonomy)

judge karlin

Reynolds v. Reynolds (In re Reynolds)

Ruling
Guardian ad litem and state court judge willfully violated stay by causing contempt citation to be issued against debtor for non-payment of fees.
Procedural posture

A chapter 13 debtor filed a motion for an order to show cause why a creditor and its employee should not be held in contempt of court for violating the automatic stay, 11 U.S.C.S. § 362.

ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of Reynolds v. Reynolds (In re Reynolds) Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member

Consumer opinion summary, case decided on February 08, 2008 , LexisNexis #0308025

In re Bingham

Ruling
Debtor who did not meet residency requirement could not claim state homestead exemption.
Procedural posture

The chapter 7 trustee filed an objection to the debtor's claim of a homestead exemption under Kansas law, asserting that the debtor had not been domiciled in Kansas for the 730 days (2 years) prior to her filing a bankruptcy petition.

ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of In re Bingham Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member

Consumer opinion summary, case decided on January 18, 2008 , LexisNexis #0208-115

In re Bailey

Ruling
Child support obligation was nondischargeable and could not be satisfied by payment of one half of amount owed.
Procedural posture

A debtor filed a motion to determine that her child support obligation to a creditor was paid through her chapter 13 plan. The creditors objected that the debt was not dischargeable.

ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of In re Bailey Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member

Consumer opinion summary, case decided on December 20, 2007 , LexisNexis #0108-096

In re Munck

Ruling
State could not reopen case for determination of dischargeability of child support which was barred by plan confirmation.
Procedural posture

The debtors filed for relief under chapter 13 and the case was closed in January, 2006. A creditor, the State of West Virginia, on behalf of a mother, sought to reopen the case to determine dischargeability of a child support obligation owed to the mother. Debtors sought an order to show cause why the State should not be held in contempt for taking action to collect the debt at issue.

ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of In re Munck Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member

Consumer opinion summary, case decided on December 07, 2007 , LexisNexis #0108-069

Martin v. American Family Mut. Ins. Co. (In re Martin)

Ruling
Private employer's failure to hire debtor due to past bankruptcy filing was not discriminatory.
Procedural posture

Plaintiff debtor filed an adversary proceeding against defendant prospective employers claiming that they had violated the anti-discrimination provisions contained in 11 U.S.C. § 525(b) by refusing to hire her solely on the basis that she had previously filed a bankruptcy petition. Defendants filed a motion to dismiss pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b), as incorporated by Fed. R. Bankr. P. 7012.

ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of Martin v. American Family Mut. Ins. Co. (In re Martin) Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member

Consumer opinion summary, case decided on September 28, 2007 , LexisNexis #1007-113

In re Kidd

Ruling
Plans could not provide for early payment absent filing of motion for modification.
Procedural posture

Multiple debtors filed individual petitions under chapter 13, and plans for repaying their creditors. A trustee who was appointed to manage each case filed objections to confirmation of the debtors'plans.

ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of In re Kidd Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member

opinion summary, case decided on August 27, 2007 , LexisNexis #0907-123

In re Reed

Ruling
Postpetition tax refunds that were property of the estate at time of conversion could not be administered by chapter 7 trustee absent bad faith.
Procedural posture

Chapter 7 debtors in two cases filed motions to determine that their income tax refunds were not property of the chapter 7 estate. In a third chapter 7 case, the trustee filed a motion for turnover. In a fourth chapter 7 case, the chapter 7 debtors, who had converted their case from chapter 13, filed a motion to strike language in their chapter 13 confirmation order.

ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of In re Reed Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member

opinion summary, case decided on July 09, 2007 , LexisNexis #0907-062

In re Gaddis

Ruling
Case dismissed where debtor received credit counseling 186 days prior to petition date.
Procedural posture

The debtor filed for relief under chapter 7. The court issued a show cause order, requiring the debtor to show cause why her case should not be dismissed for failure to comply with the prepetition credit counseling requirements set forth in 11 U.S.C. § 109(h).

ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of In re Gaddis Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member

opinion summary, case decided on June 04, 2007 , LexisNexis #0807-003

In re Pohl

Ruling
Confirmation of below-median debtors'plan denied due to failure to extend for 36 months.
Procedural posture

The chapter 13 trustee objected to the confirmation of the below-median income debtors'plan on the basis that the plan failed to extend at least 36 months or, alternatively, to pay all unsecured creditors in full, as required under 11 U.S.C. § 1325(b)(4).

ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of In re Pohl Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member

opinion summary, case decided on May 15, 2007 , LexisNexis #0607-119

In re Lanning

Ruling
Debtors bound by calculation of projected disposable income on Form B22C absent showing of substantial change in circumstances.
Procedural posture

The chapter 13 trustee objected to confirmation of the plans in two bankruptcy cases on the basis that the plans failed to provide that all of the above-median income debtors' projected disposable income to be received in the applicable commitment period would be applied to make payments to unsecured creditors under the plan as required by 11 U.S.C. § 1325.

ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of In re Lanning Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member

opinion summary, case decided on May 15, 2007 , LexisNexis #0607-121