§ 109

In re Hubel

Appellant debtor appealed from a letter decision and order of the Bankruptcy Court, denying his request for an exemption from the credit counseling requirement of 11 U.S.C.S. § 109(h).
Ruling: 
Dismissal for failure to obtain required credit counseling upheld despite incarcerated debtor's inability to comply.
ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of In re Hubel. Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member
Consumer case opionion summary, case decided on September 08,2008, LexisNexis #1008-072

In re Cellitit

A debtor filed for protection under chapter 13 of the Bankruptcy Code. The standing chapter 13 trustee filed a notice of default and a motion to dismiss. A secured creditor filed an objection to confirmation of the debtor's plan and an opposition to dismissal.
Ruling: 
Chapter 13 case dismissed with 180-day filing bar due to debtor's failure to make timely plan payments.
ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of In re Cellitit. Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member
Consumer case opionion summary, case decided on August 15,2008, LexisNexis #1108-039

In re Vinieris

Movant creditor sought dismissal of a chapter 13 on the basis that it was a judgment creditor with a secured claim against debtor exceeding $9.9 million, rendering debtor ineligible to file a chapter 13 due to 11 U.S.C.S. § 109(e). Debtor opposed the motion on the ground that movant was no longer a judgment creditor by reason of the age of the underlying judgment. The status of the debt under state law including N.Y. C.P.L.R. § 5014 was at issue.
Ruling: 
Secured judgment that was still valid after more than twenty years was in excess of chapter 13 debt limits, disqualifying debtor.
ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of In re Vinieris. Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member
Consumer case opionion summary, case decided on August 07,2008, LexisNexis #0808-107

In re Weiser

Objections to confirmation on various grounds including lack of eligibility for chapter 13 relief under 11 U.S.C.S. § 109(e) and lack of good faith under 11 U.S.C.S. § 1325(a)(3) were asserted by plaintiffs, three lenders, all of which claimed that debtors were not entitled to relief. At issue was whether debtors' participation in challenged loan transactions provided grounds for denial of relief under chapter 13.
Ruling: 
Debtors with unsecured debt in excess of limits were ineligible under chapter 13.
ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of In re Weiser. Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member
Consumer case opionion summary, case decided on July 31,2008, LexisNexis #0908-036

In re Taylor

Debtors filed a petition under chapter 13 of the Bankruptcy Code, and a trustee was appointed to represent the bankruptcy estate. The trustee filed a motion to dismiss the debtors' case, claiming that the debtors were not eligible for Chapter 13 relief because their noncontingent, liquidated debts exceeded the debt limits allowed by 11 U.S.C.S. § 109(e).
Ruling: 
Guarantees were noncontingent liquidated debts causing debtor to exceed chapter 13 limits.
ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of In re Taylor. Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member
Consumer case opionion summary, case decided on July 25,2008, LexisNexis #1008-002

In re Mortgage Banking Trust

Movant sought to dismiss, pursuant to 11 U.S.C.S. § 1112, the chapter 11 filing by debtor, an alleged business trust, on the grounds that the debtor was not eligible to seek bankruptcy relief under 11 U.S.C.S. § 109(d).
Ruling: 
Personal trust was not an eligible debtor.
ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of In re Mortgage Banking Trust. Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member
Commercial case opionion summary, case decided on July 23,2008, LexisNexis #0908-107

In re Mahjor

A debtor filed a voluntary petition for adjustment of his debts under Chapter 13 of the Bankruptcy Code. Pursuant to 11 U.S.C.S. § 109(h)(3)(A), the debtor requested deferment of the required credit counseling due to exigent circumstances.
Ruling: 
Deferment of credit counseling requirement denied where debtor did not show it had requested counseling but was unable to obtain same within five days.
ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of In re Mahjor. Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member
Consumer case opionion summary, case decided on July 14,2008, LexisNexis #0908-037

In re Francisco

Appellant debtor sought review of a decision of the United States Bankruptcy Court for the District of New Mexico, which dismissed her chapter 13 petition for failure to timely obtain credit counseling under 11 U.S.C.S. § 109(h)(1).
Ruling: 
Credit counseling obtained on petition date satisfied "180 days preceeding date of filing" requirement.
ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of In re Francisco. Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member
Consumer case opionion summary, case decided on July 02,2008, LexisNexis #0708-106

In re Anderson

In January 2008, the debtors filed a petition under chapter 13 of the Bankruptcy Code,which was dismissed because the debtors had not obtained pre-petition credit counseling. The debtors filed an amended petition.
Ruling: 
Amended petition allowed after debtors remedied failure to receive required credit counseling.
ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of In re Anderson. Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member
Consumer case opionion summary, case decided on June 30,2008, LexisNexis #1008-001

In re Mitchell

A debtor filed a motion for reconsideration of an order, which dismissed his chapter 7 case for failure to comply with the credit counseling requirement articulated in 11 U.S.C.S. § 109(h).
Ruling: 
Postpetition credit counseling did not satisfy requirement where temporary waiver had been denied.
ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of In re Mitchell. Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member
Consumer case opionion summary, case decided on June 17,2008, LexisNexis #0708-107

Pages

Subscribe to § 109