Skip to main content

Page Banner(Taxonomy)

judge taylor

Rediger Invs. Corp. v. H Granados Communs. Inc. (In re H Granados Communs. Inc.)

Ruling
Finding of willful stay violation due to continued prosecution of lawsuit upheld.
Issue(s)
Did creditor's continued prosecution of unlawful detainer action against debtor violate the automatic stay.

ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of Rediger Invs. Corp. v. H Granados Communs. Inc. (In re H Granados Communs. Inc.) Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member

Court :
Judge or Jurisdiction information not available
Commercial opinion summary, case decided on December 24, 2013 , LexisNexis #0114-112

Young v. Young (In re Young)

Ruling
Debtor's counsel suspended, reprimanded, fined and ordered to attend CLE due to filing plan for improper purpose and false allegations in adversary proceeding against debtor's former spouse.
Issue(s)
Should debtor's counsel be sanctioned for filing modified plan which failed to provide alimony and fees owed to former spouse and for filing adversary proceeding against former spouse containing untrue allegations.

ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of Young v. Young (In re Young) Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member

Consumer opinion summary, case decided on September 11, 2013 , LexisNexis #1013-033

Young v. Young (In re Young)

Ruling
Debtor's former spouse violated stay by pursing contempt order based on domestic support obligation in state court.
Procedural posture

Debtor brought an adversary proceeding against former spouse of the debtor alleging that the spouse willfully violated the automatic bankruptcy stay by pursuing state-court proceedings to hold the debtor in contempt for failing to pay a pre-petition judgment for attorney fees and restitution and failing to pay post-petition alimony.

ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of Young v. Young (In re Young) Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member

Consumer opinion summary, case decided on June 10, 2013 , LexisNexis #0713-077

In re White

Ruling
Debtors could not file involuntary proof of claim on behalf of state for postpetition taxes.
Procedural posture

Chapter 13 debtors filed a proposed modification of their plan, a motion for an order of release of the lien of a state, and an involuntary claim on behalf of the state.

ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of In re White Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member

Consumer opinion summary, case decided on November 06, 2012 , LexisNexis #1112-132

In re Johnson

Ruling
Confirmation denied due to mischaracterization and deficiencies.
Procedural posture

Mortgage creditor filed an objection to chapter 13 debtors' proposed plan, which sought to classify the creditor's claim as unsecured, on the theory that the parties had entered into a contract for deed rather than a secured mortgage. The creditor asserted that debtors had failed to pay taxes on the real property for a number of years.

ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of In re Johnson Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member

Consumer opinion summary, case decided on October 10, 2012 , LexisNexis #1112-031

United States Trustee v. Tran (In re Tran)

Ruling
Discharge denied due to debtor's failure to keep records or explain disappearance of significant assets.
Procedural posture

United States Trustee sought to bar defendant debtor's discharge under 11 U.S.C.S. § 727(a)(3) and (5).

ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of United States Trustee v. Tran (In re Tran) Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member

Consumer opinion summary, case decided on January 24, 2012 , LexisNexis #0312-025

In re Bacon

Ruling
Debtor could not modify plan to accommodate new monthly car payments and increased insurance on Cadillac.
Procedural posture

Approximately five months after confirmation of her plan of reorganization, a debtor sought to modify the plan pursuant to 11 U.S.C.S. § 1329. The bankruptcy trustee filed an objection.

ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of In re Bacon Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member

Consumer opinion summary, case decided on May 26, 2011 , LexisNexis #0611-102

In re White

Ruling
Lien which affixed to entireties property before divorce and conversion to tenancy-in-common could not be avoided.
Procedural posture

Debtors filed separate chapter 7 bankruptcy cases. In each case, the creditor filed its Objection to Debtor's Claimed Exemption/Motion for Relief from Stay (individually, "Objection" and "Motion for Relief"). Thereafter, each debtor filed a Motion to Avoid Lien with respect to the judgment lien asserted by the creditor. The creditor filed a Motion for Summary Judgment and debtors filed a Counter Motion for Summary Judgment.

ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of In re White Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member

Consumer opinion summary, case decided on April 29, 2011 , LexisNexis #0511-114

In re Penta Water Co.

Ruling
Plan including establishment of administrative reserve confirmed..
Procedural posture

The debtor and debtor in possession, and the official committee of unsecured creditors jointly filed a chapter 11 plan of reorganization, which came on for hearing under Fed. R. Bankr. P. 3020(b)(2).

ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of In re Penta Water Co. Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member

Commercial opinion summary, case decided on August 30, 2010 , LexisNexis #0111-067

Helena Chemical Co. v. Richmond (In re Richmond)

Ruling
Discharge denied due to debtor's misrepresentations, false oaths and concealment of assets.
Procedural posture

Creditor brought an adversary proceeding against bankruptcy debtor seeking determinations that a debt to the creditor was nondischargeable under 11 U.S.C.S. § 523 and that the debtor should be denied a discharge under 11 U.S.C.S. § 727 based on the debtor's false pretenses, misrepresentations, and willful and malicious injury.

ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of Helena Chemical Co. v. Richmond (In re Richmond) Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member

Consumer opinion summary, case decided on June 08, 2010 , LexisNexis #0810-059