Skip to main content

In re Beasley

In re Beasley

Ruling
Debtor could not bifurcate second claim in 910 vehicle purchased for personal use of spouse who filed separately.
Procedural posture

A debtor filed for relief under chapter 13 and submitted a proposed plan. A creditor objected to the plan because the creditor's secured claim in the debtor's vehicle would be bifurcated into secured and unsecured portions and "crammed down," in alleged violation of 11 U.S.C. § 1325(a).

ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of In re Beasley Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member

Consumer opinion summary, case decided on October 09, 2007 , LexisNexis #1107-014