Skip to main content

§ 1123(a)(5)(G)

In re Catton

Ruling
Debtor was not entitled to a credit for the default interest he paid to either the bank or asecond lender. (Bankr. S.D. Cal.)
Issue(s)
Was debtor entitled to credit for default interest paid to lenders?

ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of In re Catton Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member

Consumer opinion summary, case decided on August 09, 2016 , LexisNexis #0916-030

In re Eskim LLC

Ruling
Relief from stay denied where debtor's plan would cure default on loan from creditor.
Procedural posture

A debtor filed for relief under chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy Code. A creditor sought relief from the automatic stay so that it could begin liquidating 47 residential properties that secured the debt owed to the creditor and sought to prohibit the debtor from using its cash collateral.

ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of In re Eskim LLC Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member

Commercial opinion summary, case decided on August 28, 2008 , LexisNexis #0908-088