Skip to main content

§ 1123(a)(5)

Purdue Pharma L.P., In re

Ruling
Plan's third-party claims release provision allowed provided debtor's conduct is shown to be alegal cause of the released claims. (Bankr. S.D.N.Y.)
Issue(s)
Contents of Plan; Mandatory Provisions; Adequate Means of Implementation.

ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of Purdue Pharma L.P., In re Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member

Commercial opinion summary, case decided on September 17, 2021 , LexisNexis #1121-043

In re Kirk LLC

Ruling
LLC's proposed plan confirmed because there is an adequate disclosure statement and allcreditors had voted in favor of the plan. (Bankr. D. Utah)
Issue(s)
Contents of Plan; Mandatory Provisions; Adequate Means of Implementation.

ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of In re Kirk LLC Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member

Commercial opinion summary, case decided on December 15, 2016 , LexisNexis #0117-080

In re Catton

Ruling
Debtor was not entitled to a credit for the default interest he paid to either the bank or asecond lender. (Bankr. S.D. Cal.)
Issue(s)
Was debtor entitled to credit for default interest paid to lenders?

ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of In re Catton Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member

Consumer opinion summary, case decided on August 09, 2016 , LexisNexis #0916-030

Irving Tanning Co. v. Maine Superintendent of Ins.

Ruling
Confirmation properly denied due to discharge of liabilities of guarantors and accelerating deadlines for filing of workers' compensation claims.
Issue(s)
Was discharge properly denied due to discharging liabilities of debtors' guarantors through a channeling injunction and acceleration of workers' compensation deadlines.

ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of Irving Tanning Co. v. Maine Superintendent of Ins. Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member

Court :
Judge or Jurisdiction information not available
Commercial opinion summary, case decided on August 15, 2013 , LexisNexis #0913-061

In re Eskim LLC

Ruling
Relief from stay denied where debtor's plan would cure default on loan from creditor.
Procedural posture

A debtor filed for relief under chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy Code. A creditor sought relief from the automatic stay so that it could begin liquidating 47 residential properties that secured the debt owed to the creditor and sought to prohibit the debtor from using its cash collateral.

ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of In re Eskim LLC Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member

Commercial opinion summary, case decided on August 28, 2008 , LexisNexis #0908-088

In re Federal-Mogul Global Inc.

Ruling
Debtors could assign asbestos insurance policies to 524(g) trust despite anti-assignment provisions.
Procedural posture

Objecting insurers challenged the assignment by chapter 11 debtors of asbestos insurance policies to a 11 U.S.C.S. § 524(g) trust, notwithstanding anti-assignment provisions in or incorporated in the policies and applicable state law.

ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of In re Federal-Mogul Global Inc. Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member

Commercial opinion summary, case decided on March 19, 2008 , LexisNexis #0408-103

In re Nattel

Ruling
Non-operating entity with no prospect of rehabilitation could file chapter 11 case to challenge preclusive effect of foreign court's valuation order.
Procedural posture

A creditor filed motions to dismiss a debtor's chapter 11 bankruptcy case under 11 U.S.C. § 1112(b)(1) or in the alternative, for abstention under 11 U.S.C. § 305(a), , in the alternative, for relief from the automatic stay under 11 U.S.C. § 362(d)(1).

ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of In re Nattel Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member

opinion summary, case decided on December 28, 2006 , LexisNexis #0207-084