- 11 U.S.C.
In re Cox
Jun
29
2007
Ruling
Anti-cramdown provision applied only to secured claims and real property and did not apply to principal residence that was a motor home.
Procedural posture
The debtor filed a petition under chapter 13 and a plan for repaying her creditors. A creditor that held a mortgage on a mobile home the debtor owned filed an objection to the debtor's plan because it proposed to modify the creditor's rights by paying the creditor less than the full amount of its claim.
ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of In re Cox Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member
Court
: