Schultz v. United States
Jun
02
2008
Ruling
BAPCPA did not violate Bankruptcy Clause as median income calculations based on state and county of debtor's residence did not result in non-uniform law.
Procedural posture
Plaintiffs, a husband and wife who had filed for chapter 13 bankruptcy, challenged the decision entered by the District Court for the Eastern District of Tennessee that granted defendant government's motion for summary judgment and dismissed the couple's complaint that sought declaratory judgment, alleging that the Bankruptcy Abuse Prevention and Consumer Protection Act (BAPCPA) violated the Bankruptcy Clause.
ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of Schultz v. United States Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member
Court
:
Judge or Jurisdiction information not available