Bronitsky v. Bea (In re Bea)
May
29
2015
Ruling
Confirmation of plan proposing delayed start to payments to secured creditors, who did not object to treatment, over objection of trustee, affirmed.
Issue(s)
Did the bankruptcy court err in confirming debtor's chapter 13 plan over trustee's objection that the deferred payments to the secured creditors did not provide them with adequate protection during the first six months of the plan, even thought the creditors did not object?
ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of Bronitsky v. Bea (In re Bea) Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member
Court
:
Judge or Jurisdiction information not available