Skip to main content

Page Banner(Taxonomy)

western district of virginia

AFI Holding Inc. v. Barclay

Ruling
Bankruptcy court erred in finding that investors in debtor's Ponzi scheme did not exchange reasonably equivalent value up to amount invested.
Procedural posture

Appellants, investors in chapter 7 debtor, challenged a decision of the Bankruptcy Court for the Central District of California, which granted appellee chapter 7 trustee summary judgment in an action to avoid transfers the debtor made to the investors prior to the debtor's bankruptcy pursuant to 11 U.S.C.S. § 544(b). The trustee cross-appealed the bankruptcy courts denial of prejudgment interest.

ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of AFI Holding Inc. v. Barclay Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member

Commercial opinion summary, case decided on September 04, 2008 , LexisNexis #1108-029

Paul v. Iglehart (In re Paul)

Ruling
Continuation of litigation in which debtors were nominal defendants including pursuit of discovery did not violate discharge injunction.
Procedural posture

This case concerned the protective scope of the discharge injunction. Plaintiff debtors brought an adversary proceeding against defendant, a state court plaintiff, alleging violation of the discharge injunction of 11 U.S.C.S. § 524(a)(2). The District Court for the District of Colorado held that the state court plaintiff violated the discharge injunction. The state court plaintiff appealed.

ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of Paul v. Iglehart (In re Paul) Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member

Court :
Judge or Jurisdiction information not available
Consumer opinion summary, case decided on July 28, 2008 , LexisNexis #0808-099

United States v. Henry

Ruling
Criminal contempt proceeding for debtor's deletion of computer files that were subject to subpeona was not subject to stay.
Procedural posture

Intervening plaintiffs filed a motion for sanctions and the issuance of an order to show cause why movant should not have been held in contempt of court.

ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of United States v. Henry Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member

Consumer opinion summary, case decided on July 01, 2008 , LexisNexis #0708-112

In re Milby

Ruling
Bankruptcy court lacked jurisdiction to determine if debtor met reaffirmation obligations to prevent ipso facto repossession under BAPCPA.
Procedural posture

A debtor sought a ruling that he performed his obligations under 11 U.S.C.S. §§ 521(a) and 362(h) or, alternatively, for approval of two reaffirmation agreements for auto loan debts that he entered into with a bank.

ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of In re Milby Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member

Consumer opinion summary, case decided on June 16, 2008 , LexisNexis #0708-117

Comer v. United States SSA (In re Comer)

Ruling
Debtor could not recover valid setoff against tax refund by Social Security Administration.
Procedural posture

Plaintiff chapter 7 debtors filed a complaint against the United States Social Security Administration (SSA), seeking to recover, pursuant to 11 U.S.C.S. § 547 and § 553(b), a setoff by the SSA of the debtors' federal tax refund against indebtedness owed to the SSA for overpayment of Social Security benefits.

ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of Comer v. United States SSA (In re Comer) Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member

Consumer opinion summary, case decided on April 18, 2008 , LexisNexis #0508-082

In re Forgette

Ruling
Car loan payments debtor owed pursuant to divorce decree did not establish claim for former spouse as payments were owed directly to lender.
Procedural posture

Respondent debtor objected to claimant ex-wife's priority claim in his chapter 13 bankruptcy. The claim represented the debt owed to a creditor bank on a repossessed vehicle.

ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of In re Forgette Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member

Consumer opinion summary, case decided on November 30, 2007 , LexisNexis #0108-071

Shaver v. Forgette (In re Forgette)

Ruling
Debtor's liability for car payments pursuant to divorce decree was not a domestic support obligation and was subject to stay.
Procedural posture

Movant, the ex-wife of a chapter 13 debtor, sought relief from stay pursuant to 11 U.S.C. § 362(b) or (d) to enable her to go to state court to enforce that portion of a divorce decree under which debtor was obligated for all indebtedness associated with a vehicle that the parties had owned during their marriage and which decree awarded movant certain rights of use for a limited period of time.

ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of Shaver v. Forgette (In re Forgette) Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member

Consumer opinion summary, case decided on November 30, 2007 , LexisNexis #0108-072

In re Lephew

Ruling
Debtors with income below 150% of poverty line who had filing fee at petition date but spent the funds prior to hearing denied waiver.
Procedural posture

Chapter 7 debtors filed an application for a waiver of the chapter 7 filing fee pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1930(f).

ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of In re Lephew Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member

Consumer opinion summary, case decided on November 09, 2007 , LexisNexis #0208-064

In re Phillips

Ruling
Debtor who claimed non-necessary expenses and received tax refund not entitled to waiver of filing fee.
Procedural posture

Debtors'filed an application for a waiver of a chapter 7 filing fee, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1930(f).

ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of In re Phillips Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member

Consumer opinion summary, case decided on August 20, 2007 , LexisNexis #1007-059

Magar v. United States

Ruling
Bankruptcy court properly revoked discharge due to debtors'failure to obey order for turnover of tax refunds.
Procedural posture

Appellee trustee filed a complaint to revoke appellant debtors'chapter 7 discharge pursuant to 11 U.S.C. § 727(d)(3) based on the debtors'refusal to obey an order requiring the debtors to turn over a portion of their federal and state tax refunds to the trustee. The debtors appealed from an order of the bankruptcy court revoking the debtors'discharge.

ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of Magar v. United States Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member

opinion summary, case decided on July 31, 2007 , LexisNexis #0807-138