In re Milby
Jun
16
2008
Ruling
Bankruptcy court lacked jurisdiction to determine if debtor met reaffirmation obligations to prevent ipso facto repossession under BAPCPA.
Procedural posture
A debtor sought a ruling that he performed his obligations under 11 U.S.C.S. §§ 521(a) and 362(h) or, alternatively, for approval of two reaffirmation agreements for auto loan debts that he entered into with a bank.
ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of In re Milby Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member
Court
: