Skip to main content

Page Banner(Taxonomy)

judge 6

Ringgold, In re--Glatz Aeronautical Corp. v. Ringgold

Ruling
Creditor was entitled to summary judgment with respect to its burden establishing that thesanctions order represented a nondischargeable debt for willful injury. (Bankr. E.D. Pa.)
Issue(s)
Exceptions to Discharge; Types of Debt Excepted; Willful and Malicious Injury to

ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of Ringgold, In re--Glatz Aeronautical Corp. v. Ringgold Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member

Consumer opinion summary, case decided on January 23, 2023 , LexisNexis #0323-062