Skip to main content

§ 1334(c)

McVey v. Johnson (In re SBMC Healthcare LLC)

Ruling
Shareholders' derivative claims dismissed as properly belonging to debtor's estate and direct claims remanded pursuant to permissive abstention.
Issue(s)
Should shareholders' adversary proceeding against debtor's attorneys for malpractice, breach of fiduciary duty, and unfair trade practices based on alleged negligence in advising debtor to file bankruptcy be remanded or dismissed?

ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of McVey v. Johnson (In re SBMC Healthcare LLC) Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member

Commercial opinion summary, case decided on September 18, 2014 , LexisNexis #1014-069

Callan v. Black Strata LLC (In re Montcrest Energy)

Ruling
Bankruptcy court exercised discretionary abstention from investors' case against former officers, directors and professionals of debtor energy company.
Issue(s)
Should bankruptcy court abstain from hearing from investors' case against former officers, directors and professionals of debtor energy company?

ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of Callan v. Black Strata LLC (In re Montcrest Energy) Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member

Commercial opinion summary, case decided on September 09, 2014 , LexisNexis #1014-033

Peterson v. Bechard (In re Bechard)

Ruling
Court abstained from hearing removed state court action that was merely tangentially related to debtor's bankruptcy.
Issue(s)
Should removed action exclusively concerning issues of state law, and containing no issues of federal law of any kind, be resolved by the state court in which it was filed?

ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of Peterson v. Bechard (In re Bechard) Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member

Consumer opinion summary, case decided on July 21, 2014 , LexisNexis #0814-139

Parmalat Capital Fin. Ltd. v. Grant Thornton Intl

Ruling
Case related to bankruptcy but arising under state law was subject to mandatory abstention.
Issue(s)
Should district court abstain from hearing a proceeding based upon a state law claim and related to a case under title 11 with respect to which an action could not have been commenced in a court of the United States absent jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1334(b), if the action can be timely adjudicated in state court?

ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of Parmalat Capital Fin. Ltd. v. Grant Thornton Intl Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member

Court :
Judge or Jurisdiction information not available
Commercial opinion summary, case decided on June 25, 2014 , LexisNexis #0714-137

Ritchie Capital Mgmt. L.L.C. v. Opportunity Fin. L.L.C.

Ruling
Court abstained from hearing investors' non-core action against lenders regarding debtor's Ponzi schemes that was related to debtor's bankruptcy.
Issue(s)
Should court abstain from hearing investors' action against lenders regarding debtor's Ponzi schemes?

ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of Ritchie Capital Mgmt. L.L.C. v. Opportunity Fin. L.L.C. Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member

Commercial opinion summary, case decided on June 05, 2014 , LexisNexis #0714-105

Kanawyer v. Musholt (In re Musholt)

Ruling
Court abstained from hearing state law claims pursuant to state marital dissolution proceeding.
Issue(s)
Should bankruptcy court abstain from hearing state law issues related to violations of state court orders in debtor's marriage dissolution proceeding?

ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of Kanawyer v. Musholt (In re Musholt) Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member

Consumer opinion summary, case decided on June 03, 2014 , LexisNexis #0814-035

Johnson v. Woodlands Dev. LLC (In re Johnson)

Ruling
Adversary proceeding regarding overpayment of insurance proceeds was a core proceeding.
Issue(s)
Should bankruptcy court abstain from hearing proceeding regarding dispute over ownership of insurance proceeds for damage from Hurricane Katrina?

ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of Johnson v. Woodlands Dev. LLC (In re Johnson) Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member

Consumer opinion summary, case decided on February 24, 2014 , LexisNexis #0614-068

Milian v. Wells Fargo & Co.

Ruling
Bankruptcy court did not err in abstaining from proceeding solely concerning state foreclosure action.
Issue(s)
Did bankruptcy court properly abstain from hearing state law foreclosure action?

ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of Milian v. Wells Fargo & Co. Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member

Consumer opinion summary, case decided on February 18, 2014 , LexisNexis #0714-033

Farmers Bank & Trust Co. v. Chickshaw Props. LLC (In re Burrow)

Ruling
Bankruptcy court abstained from and remanded proceeding for determination of priority of mortgages on property owned by debtor's LLC.
Issue(s)
Should bankruptcy court abstain from hearing proceeding for determination of priority of mortgages on property owned by debtor's LLC?

ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of Farmers Bank & Trust Co. v. Chickshaw Props. LLC (In re Burrow) Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member

Consumer opinion summary, case decided on December 07, 2013 , LexisNexis #0314-136

In re Dynergy Inc.

Ruling
Bankruptcy court abstained from determining if complaint in securities litigation included claim released in chapter 11 plan.
Procedural posture

A chapter 11 debtor filed a motion to enforce the court's order confirming a joint chapter 11 plan of reorganization. The debtor alleged that an amended complaint filed by the lead plaintiff in securities litigation pending in federal district court violated a paragraph of the confirmation order.

ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of In re Dynergy Inc. Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member

Commercial opinion summary, case decided on February 15, 2013 , LexisNexis #0313-067