Skip to main content

§ 1334(c)

Turner Grain Merch. Inc. v. Ltd Farms Pship (In re Turner Grain Merch. Inc.)

Ruling
Permissive abstention appropriate for claims against non-debtor parties in which state law issues predominated.
Issue(s)
Whether the court should sever, abstain from hearing, and remand certain claims in an action removed from state court?

ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of Turner Grain Merch. Inc. v. Ltd Farms Pship (In re Turner Grain Merch. Inc.) Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member

Commercial opinion summary, case decided on January 19, 2016 , LexisNexis #0416-102

Bennett v. Morton Bldgs. Inc. (In re Bennett)

Ruling
Bankruptcy court did not abstain from hearing nondischargeability counterclaims in which bankruptcy issues predominated.
Issue(s)
Should bankruptcy court abstain from hearing creditor's nondischargeability counterclaims to debtor's proceeding claiming violation of the discharge injunction while creditor's state law claims against debtor were pending in state court?

ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of Bennett v. Morton Bldgs. Inc. (In re Bennett) Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member

Consumer opinion summary, case decided on December 07, 2015 , LexisNexis #1215-136

Laddusire v. Auto-Owners Ins. Co. (In re Laddusire)

Ruling
Bankruptcy court abstained from hearing removed state court proceeding that was non-core and would have little effect on administration.
Issue(s)
Was state court tort action that was removed to bankruptcy court subject to mandatory or permissive abstention?

ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of Laddusire v. Auto-Owners Ins. Co. (In re Laddusire) Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member

Consumer opinion summary, case decided on November 19, 2015 , LexisNexis #1215-067

Loos v. Koperski (In re Koperski)

Ruling
Bankruptcy court exercised discretionary abstention with regard to state law defamation claims brought by debtor's former spouse.
Issue(s)
Should the bankruptcy court abstain from hearing and determining debtor's former spouse's defamation claims?

ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of Loos v. Koperski (In re Koperski) Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member

Consumer opinion summary, case decided on November 05, 2015 , LexisNexis #1215-031

OptimumBank v. Buena Vista Oceanside LLC (In re Buena Vista Oceanside LLC)

Ruling
Bankruptcy court lacked jurisdiction to adjudicate a motion to enforce a stipulation.
Issue(s)
Did the bankruptcy court have jurisdiction to enforce a previously entered confirmation order and stipulation to compel debtor to dismiss counterclaims filed in separate litigation?

ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of OptimumBank v. Buena Vista Oceanside LLC (In re Buena Vista Oceanside LLC) Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member

Commercial opinion summary, case decided on September 22, 2015 , LexisNexis #1015-069

Giese v. Cmty. Trust Bank (In re HNRC Dissolution Co.)

Ruling
State law dispute over ownership of funds arose in bankruptcy case and did not warrant mandatory abstention.
Issue(s)
Should bankruptcy court exercise mandatory abstention with regard to an action seeking an adjudication of title to funds that the court had already adjudicated at least once, if not twice?

ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of Giese v. Cmty. Trust Bank (In re HNRC Dissolution Co.) Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member

Commercial opinion summary, case decided on September 09, 2015 , LexisNexis #1015-032

Firefighters Ret. Sys. v. Citco Grp. Ltd.

Ruling
District court could not permissively abstain from exercising jurisdiction in a case that was related to chapter 15 bankruptcies
Issue(s)
Could district court permissively abstain from exercising jurisdiction in proceedings related to chapter 15 cases?

ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of Firefighters Ret. Sys. v. Citco Grp. Ltd. Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member

Court :
Judge or Jurisdiction information not available
Commercial opinion summary, case decided on August 06, 2015 , LexisNexis #0915-034

Reichardt v. Valley Health Sys. Ret. Plan (In re Valley Health Sys.)

Ruling
Abstention and remand of beneficiaries' claims against the administrator of debtor's retirement plan not warranted.
Issue(s)
Should bankruptcy court abstain from hearing beneficiaries' claims against administrator of debtor's retirement plan?

ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of Reichardt v. Valley Health Sys. Ret. Plan (In re Valley Health Sys.) Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member

Commercial opinion summary, case decided on July 24, 2015 , LexisNexis #0815-105

Ruddick v. Read (In re Read)

Ruling
Bankruptcy abstained from hearing state law dispute over property settlement agreement between debtor and former spouse.
Issue(s)
Was debt owed pursuant to property settlement agreement between debtor and former spouse and currently disputed by debtor nondischargeable?

ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of Ruddick v. Read (In re Read) Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member

Consumer opinion summary, case decided on July 10, 2015 , LexisNexis #0815-032

Holt v. Carlson (In re Carlson)

Ruling
Bankruptcy court exercised permissive abstention with regard to dispute over home repairs.
Issue(s)
Should the bankruptcy court abstain from hearing state law dispute over repairs on debtor's fire- damaged residence?

ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of Holt v. Carlson (In re Carlson) Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member

Consumer opinion summary, case decided on June 30, 2015 , LexisNexis #0715-138