- 11 U.S.C.
In re Herman
Nov
26
2013
Ruling
Creditor whose lawyer received notice of petition could not reopen case to object to discharge on grounds of fraud.
Issue(s)
Was creditor entitled to reopen the bankruptcy case and pursue revocation of the discharge of the debt and a nondischargeability complaint more than one year after deadline due to alleged improper notice?
ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of In re Herman Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member
Court
:
Judge or Jurisdiction information not available