Skip to main content

Silliman v. Muria (In re United Funding Mortg. Corp.)

Silliman v. Muria (In re United Funding Mortg. Corp.)

Ruling
Claim filed by owners of 100 percent of debtor's preferred capital stock for fraud or rescission subordinated to claims of other creditors.
Procedural posture

Movant trustee asked the court to grant summary judgment on its adversary complaint to subordinate certain claims filed by defendants, the owners of 100% of the preferred capital stock of debtor, to the claims of other creditors as per 11 U.S.C.S. § 510(b). Defendants did not file in opposition to the motion.

ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of Silliman v. Muria (In re United Funding Mortg. Corp.) Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member

Commercial opinion summary, case decided on August 09, 2012 , LexisNexis #1212-079