- 11 U.S.C.
Hutt v. Maryland Cas. Co. (In re W.R. Grace & Co.)
Oct
17
2016
Ruling
Workers asbestos state court claims against insurer were subject to channeling injunctionexcept for workers compensation claims based on policies not referenced in the injunction.(Bankr. D. Del.)
Issue(s)
Effect of Discharge; Supplemental Injunctions in Chapter 11 Proceedings; Validity and Enforceability; Generally and With Regard to Third Parties.
ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of Hutt v. Maryland Cas. Co. (In re W.R. Grace & Co.) Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member
Court
: