Skip to main content

In re Nada

In re Nada

Ruling
Postpetition collection on prepetition tax did not violate stay where debtor no longer had interest in funds on petition date.
Procedural posture

Pursuant to 11 U.S.C.S. § 362(k), the debtor filed a motion for damages against the State Board of Equalization based on a willful violation of the stay. The Board opposed the motion.

ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of In re Nada Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member

Consumer opinion summary, case decided on October 03, 2011 , LexisNexis #1111-004