Skip to main content

ATR-Kim Eng Fin. Corp. v. Bonilla

ATR-Kim Eng Fin. Corp. v. Bonilla

Ruling
Bankruptcy court properly held debt arising from fiduciary's failure to prevent majority shareholder and director from looting corporation was nondischargeable.
Procedural posture

Appellant chapter 7 debtor challenged a decision of the United States Bankruptcy Court for the Northern District of California, which held that the debt arising from the debtor's breach of fiduciary duties as a Delaware corporate director was nondischargeable under 11 U.S.C.S. § 523(a)(4).

ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of ATR-Kim Eng Fin. Corp. v. Bonilla Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member

Consumer opinion summary, case decided on September 25, 2008 , LexisNexis #1108-043