Skip to main content

§ 548(a)(1)(A)

EPD Inv. Co., LLC, In re--Kirkland v. Rund

Ruling
Judgment affirmed in fraudulent transfer proceeding as substantial evidence supported the jury's finding that the debtor operated a Ponzi scheme and presumably intended to defraud creditors. (9th Cir.)
Issue(s)
Fraudulent Transfers and Obligations; Elements of Fraudulent Transfers; Avoidable Transfers; Actual Intent to Hinder, Delay, or Defraud.

ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of EPD Inv. Co., LLC, In re--Kirkland v. Rund Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member

:
Judge or Jurisdiction information not available
Commercial opinion summary, case decided on August 23, 2024 , LexisNexis #1124-036

Orion HealthCorp, Inc., In re--Ehrenberg v. Sage Grp. Consulting, Inc.

Ruling
Defendant was not entitled to dismissal of trustee's fraud-related causes of action as thepleadings sufficiently alleged facts to satisfy the elements for each cause. (Bankr. E.D.N.Y.)
Issue(s)
Fraudulent Transfers and Obligations; Elements of Fraudulent Transfers; Avoidable

ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of Orion HealthCorp, Inc., In re--Ehrenberg v. Sage Grp. Consulting, Inc. Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member

Commercial opinion summary, case decided on May 13, 2024 , LexisNexis #0724-044

BYJU's Alpha, Inc., In re--BYJU's Alpha, Inc. v. Camshaft Capital Fund, LP

Ruling
Debtor entitled to injunction against creditor that refused to reveal location of funds allegedlyfraudulently transferred. (Bankr. D. Del.)
Issue(s)
Fraudulent Transfers and Obligations; Elements of Fraudulent Transfers; Avoidable

ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of BYJU's Alpha, Inc., In re--BYJU's Alpha, Inc. v. Camshaft Capital Fund, LP Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member

Commercial opinion summary, case decided on April 03, 2024 , LexisNexis #0624-046

MPAC Home Improvement & Constr., LLC, In re--Goldsmith v. O'Beirne

Ruling
Motion to dismiss denied given evidence that debtor intended to hinder, delay, or defraudcreditors. (Bankr. D. Mass.)
Issue(s)
Fraudulent Transfers and Obligations; Elements of Fraudulent Transfers; Avoidable

ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of MPAC Home Improvement & Constr., LLC, In re--Goldsmith v. O'Beirne Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member

Commercial opinion summary, case decided on April 01, 2024 , LexisNexis #0624-016

Legendary Field Exhibitions, LLC, In re--Dundon v. Osherow

Ruling
Complaint pleaded sufficient facts to allege promissory estoppel if neither a valid norenforceable oral contract existed under state law. (Bankr. W.D. Tex.)
Issue(s)
Fraudulent Transfers and Obligations; Elements of Fraudulent Transfers; Avoidable

ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of Legendary Field Exhibitions, LLC, In re--Dundon v. Osherow Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member

Commercial opinion summary, case decided on November 13, 2023 , LexisNexis #0124-038

Nadeau, In re--Dymarkowski v. Nadeau

Ruling
Debtor's transfer of property into revocable living trust within two years of petition date wasavoided as made with actual intent to hinder or delay collection efforts by a creditor. (Bankr.N.D. Ohio)
Issue(s)
Fraudulent Transfers and Obligations; Elements of Fraudulent Transfers; Avoidable

ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of Nadeau, In re--Dymarkowski v. Nadeau Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member

Consumer opinion summary, case decided on September 28, 2023 , LexisNexis #1223-011

Arregui, In re--Fink v. Arregui

Ruling
Transfer was actually fraudulent as made by debtors with the intent to hinder, delay, ordefraud their creditors. (Bankr. W.D. Mo.)
Issue(s)
Fraudulent Transfers and Obligations; Elements of Fraudulent Transfers; Avoidable

ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of Arregui, In re--Fink v. Arregui Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member

Consumer opinion summary, case decided on September 22, 2023 , LexisNexis #1123-092

Bonar, In re--Dye v. Bonar

Ruling
Trustee was entitled to summary judgment on her claim that the transfer of residentialproperty was actually fraudulent. (Bankr. C.D. Cal.)
Issue(s)
Fraudulent Transfers and Obligations; Elements of Fraudulent Transfers; Avoidable

ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of Bonar, In re--Dye v. Bonar Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member

Consumer opinion summary, case decided on August 28, 2023 , LexisNexis #1123-014

TransCare Corp., In re--Lamonica v. Tilton

Ruling
Foreclosure and sale of collateral by a director of the debtor to herself without a showing offair price was a fraudulent conveyance. (2d Cir.)
Issue(s)
Fraudulent Transfers and Obligations; Elements of Fraudulent Transfers; Avoidable

ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of TransCare Corp., In re--Lamonica v. Tilton Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member

:
Judge or Jurisdiction information not available
Commercial opinion summary, case decided on August 28, 2023 , LexisNexis #1023-066

Najeeb Ahmed Khan, In re--Iammartino v. Lake City Bank

Ruling
Dismissal of complaint in avoidance proceeding based on the in pari delicto defense was not warranted as it was too early in the proceedings to determine the doctrine's application. (Bankr. W.D. Mich.)
Issue(s)
Fraudulent Transfers and Obligations; Elements of Fraudulent Transfers; Avoidable Transfers; Actual Intent to Hinder, Delay, or Defraud.

ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of Najeeb Ahmed Khan, In re--Iammartino v. Lake City Bank Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member

Consumer opinion summary, case decided on May 30, 2023 , LexisNexis #0723-091