Skip to main content

§ 545(2)

Mainline Equip., Inc., In re--L.A. Cty. Treasurer & Tax Collector v. Mainline Equip., Inc.

Ruling
Debtor could avoid County's liens as County could not enforce a lien on the personal propertyof the debtor in possession, when the County had failed to perfect the lien as against a bonafide purchaser. (9th Cir.)
Issue(s)
Statutory Liens; Unperfected or Unenforceable Liens.

ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of Mainline Equip., Inc., In re--L.A. Cty. Treasurer & Tax Collector v. Mainline Equip., Inc. Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member

:
Judge or Jurisdiction information not available
Commercial opinion summary, case decided on July 31, 2017 , LexisNexis #0917-016

Leonard v. Murphy (In re Leonard)

Ruling
Debtor could not avoid creditor's interest in cattle.
Issue(s)
Could debtor in possession avoid creditor's interest in cattle where an order for replevin had issued prior to petition date?

ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of Leonard v. Murphy (In re Leonard) Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member

Consumer opinion summary, case decided on April 08, 2016 , LexisNexis #0516-024

In re Globe Bldg. Materials Inc.

Ruling
State wage lien could be avoided where statute did not give precedence over bona fide purchasers.
Procedural posture

Appellants, the State of Wisconsin and its Attorney General, sought review of a decision of the District Court for the Northern District of Indiana affirming the bankruptcy court's grant of summary judgment in favor of appellee bankruptcy trustee in the trustee's adversary proceeding, seeking to set aside the State's wage lien asserted under Wis. Stat. § 109.09 on the net sale proceeds of the debtor's property.

ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of In re Globe Bldg. Materials Inc. Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member

Court :
Judge or Jurisdiction information not available
opinion summary, case decided on September 08, 2006 , LexisNexis #1006-022