Skip to main content

§ 524(c)

In re Tincher

Ruling
Reaffirmation agreement for vehicle loan, on more favorable terms than original, approved.
Procedural posture

This matter was before the court on two reaffirmation agreements between debtor and two of his creditors.

ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of In re Tincher Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member

Consumer opinion summary, case decided on July 06, 2011 , LexisNexis #0811-017

In re Delaney

Ruling
Reaffirmation agreement on out-of-date pre-BAPCPA form was unenforceable.
Procedural posture

Before the court was a reaffirmation agreement entered into between debtor and a bank. A hearing was held.

ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of In re Delaney Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member

Consumer opinion summary, case decided on May 06, 2011 , LexisNexis #0611-018

In re Bartz

Ruling
Reaffirmation agreement could not be approved due to failure to rebut presumption of undue hardship.
Procedural posture

Movant, the chapter 7 debtor and a carpenter/construction worker, sought to reaffirm the debt securing his 2009 Chevrolet Silverado pickup truck. According to debtor's filed reaffirmation agreement, the presumption of undue hardship arose under 11 U.S.C.S. § 524(c)(6)(A).

ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of In re Bartz Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member

Consumer opinion summary, case decided on February 17, 2011 , LexisNexis #0311-055

In re Nichols

Ruling
Creditor could not seek to vacate discharge in order to file a post-discharge reaffirmation agreement.
Procedural posture

In a chapter 7 bankruptcy, a creditor moved to reopen the case and set aside the discharge in order to file a reaffirmation agreement. The debtors filed a response consenting to the motion. The reaffirmation agreement was signed after the discharge was entered. The motion to reopen was filed more than a month after the deadline to file reaffirmation agreements and almost a month after the discharge was entered.

ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of In re Nichols Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member

Consumer opinion summary, case decided on November 29, 2010 , LexisNexis #1210-085

In re Perez

Ruling
Reaffirmation agreement was unenforceable absent certification of no undue hardship.
Procedural posture

Chapter 7 debtor filed an application for approval of an agreement she entered into with a creditor which reaffirmed her intent to pay a debt she owed on a motor vehicle. The court held a hearing to determine if the reaffirmation agreement was enforceable under 11 U.S.C.S. § 524(c) absent court approval or disapproval, and, if the agreement was enforceable, whether it should be disapproved.

ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of In re Perez Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member

Consumer opinion summary, case decided on July 12, 2010 , LexisNexis #1010-052

Pickerel v. Household Realty Corp. (In re Pickerel)

Ruling
Proceeding for violation of discharge injunction dismissed where creditor's postpetition enforcement was properly based on reaffirmation agreement.
Procedural posture

Defendant mortgagee moved to dismiss an adversary proceeding brought by plaintiff mortgagors, chapter 13 debtors, in their current case (Case 2) for damages based on a claim that defendant had violated the discharge injunction granted per 11 U.S.C.S. § 524 in their 2003 bankruptcy case (Case 1). At issue was whether either of two reaffirmation agreements executed by the parties (Agreements 1 and 2) in connection with Case 1 was legally binding.

ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of Pickerel v. Household Realty Corp. (In re Pickerel) Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member

Consumer opinion summary, case decided on June 08, 2010 , LexisNexis #0810-122

In re Kernodle

Ruling
Reaffirmation agreement was enforceable despite certification of presumption of undue hardship where debtor's attorney also made a "no undue hardship" certification.
Procedural posture

The debtors filed an application for approval of a reaffirmation agreement with a credit union pursuant to 11 U.S.C.S. § 524(c). Neither the debtors nor their counsel appeared at a scheduled hearing on the application. The creditor argued that the reaffirmation agreement was enforceable without the entry of a court order approving the agreement.

ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of In re Kernodle Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member

Consumer opinion summary, case decided on May 19, 2010 , LexisNexis #0810-020

In re Mausolf

Ruling
Late filed reaffirmation agreement approved as in best interests of debtor.
Procedural posture

The chapter 7 debtor moved for approval of a reaffirmation agreement that would have enabled him to continue servicing the debt on his automobile.

ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of In re Mausolf Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member

Consumer opinion summary, case decided on April 15, 2009 , LexisNexis #0609-120

In re Goodman

Ruling
Court reviewed and denied approval of reaffirmation agreement despite debtor's counsel's refusal to sign requisite certification.
Procedural posture

A debtor sought to reaffirm a debt owed to a creditor on a vehicle. Although the debtor was represented by an attorney, the attorney declined to make the certification that 11 U.S.C.S. § 524(c)(3) required.

ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of In re Goodman Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member

Consumer opinion summary, case decided on April 06, 2009 , LexisNexis #0609-083

In re Byers

Ruling
Approval of reaffirmation agreement denied due to failure to rebut presumption of undue hardship.
Procedural posture

A debtor filed for relief under chapter 7 of the Bankruptcy Code. The debtor sought approval of a reaffirmation agreement between the debtor and a creditor, pursuant to 11 U.S.C.S. § 524(c). The debtor was represented by counsel.

ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of In re Byers Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member

Consumer opinion summary, case decided on February 11, 2009 , LexisNexis #0309-119