Skip to main content

In re Bartz

In re Bartz

Ruling
Reaffirmation agreement could not be approved due to failure to rebut presumption of undue hardship.
Procedural posture

Movant, the chapter 7 debtor and a carpenter/construction worker, sought to reaffirm the debt securing his 2009 Chevrolet Silverado pickup truck. According to debtor's filed reaffirmation agreement, the presumption of undue hardship arose under 11 U.S.C.S. § 524(c)(6)(A).

ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of In re Bartz Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member

Consumer opinion summary, case decided on February 17, 2011 , LexisNexis #0311-055