Skip to main content

§ 1327(b)

Trantham v. Tate

Ruling
Bankruptcy court erred in denying confirmation on the ground that a debtor's proposedvesting provision was contrary to its required form plan as it denied the debtor her right topropose a plan of her own choosing. (4th Cir.)
Issue(s)
Effect of Confirmation; Vesting of Property in Estate of Debtor.

ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of Trantham v. Tate Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member

:
Judge or Jurisdiction information not available
Consumer opinion summary, case decided on August 13, 2024 , LexisNexis #1024-069

Gillis, In re

Ruling
Undisclosed personal injury claims provided no basis for reopening after debtors completedpayments under Chapter 13 plans and received discharges. (Bankr. D. Mass.)
Issue(s)
Effect of Confirmation; Vesting of Property in Estate of Debtor.

ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of Gillis, In re Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member

Consumer opinion summary, case decided on August 13, 2024 , LexisNexis #1024-068

Pugh, In re

Ruling
No good cause existed to delay vesting of real property in the debtor upon confirmation of aChapter 13 plan. (Bankr. E.D. Mich.)
Issue(s)
Effect of Confirmation; Vesting of Property in Estate of Debtor.

ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of Pugh, In re Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member

Consumer opinion summary, case decided on March 18, 2024 , LexisNexis #0524-072

Hernandez, In re

Ruling
Funds held by Chapter 13 Trustee at the time of post-confirmation dismissal ordered to bedistributed to the debtor. (Bankr. D. Conn.)
Issue(s)
Effect of Confirmation; Vesting of Property in Estate of Debtor.

ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of Hernandez, In re Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member

Consumer opinion summary, case decided on January 17, 2020 , LexisNexis #0220-096

Steenes, In re

Ruling
State was entitled to an order restoring the estates' assets to the debtors' personal ownership.(7th Cir.)
Issue(s)
Effect of Confirmation; Vesting of Property in Estate of Debtor.

ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of Steenes, In re Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member

:
Judge or Jurisdiction information not available
Consumer opinion summary, case decided on March 14, 2019 , LexisNexis #0519-045

Froehlich, In re

Ruling
Court could not create a judicial exception to the estate termination theory for debtors whoconverted their cases from chapter 7 to chapter 13 to preserve non-exempt assets. (Bankr. D. Colo.)
Issue(s)
Effect of Confirmation; Vesting of Property in Estate of Debtor.

ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of Froehlich, In re Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member

Consumer opinion summary, case decided on September 27, 2018 , LexisNexis #1118-026

Mouraveiko v. Moglia

Ruling
Debtor's attorneys' misrepresentations regarding debtor's elder abuse counterclaim against former business partner, which was property of the estate, were not due to bad faith, and not grounds for sanctions.
Issue(s)
Should bankruptcy court reconsider its denial of sanctions against debtor's attorney for filing meritless elder abuse counterclaim against creditor?

ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of Mouraveiko v. Moglia Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member

Consumer opinion summary, case decided on February 17, 2015 , LexisNexis #0315-101

Flugence v. Axis Surplus Ins. Co. (In re Flugence)

Ruling
Personal injury claim not disclosed by debtor properly barred as by judicial estoppel but could be pursued by trustee.
Issue(s)
Did bankruptcy court abuse its discretion by holding that debtor was judicially estopped from pursuing personal injury claim due to nondisclosure and could trustee pursue claim on behalf of the estate?

ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of Flugence v. Axis Surplus Ins. Co. (In re Flugence) Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member

Court :
Judge or Jurisdiction information not available
Consumer opinion summary, case decided on November 22, 2013 , LexisNexis #1213-099

Flugence v. Axis Surplus Co. (In re Flugence)

Ruling
Debtor estopped from pursuing undisclosed personal injury claim that accrued postconfirmation but before amended plan was confirmed.
Issue(s)
Could debtor pursue undisclosed personal injury claim that accrued after confirmation of initial plan but before confirmation of modified plan .

ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of Flugence v. Axis Surplus Co. (In re Flugence) Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member

Court :
Judge or Jurisdiction information not available
Consumer opinion summary, case decided on October 04, 2013 , LexisNexis #1013-136

In re Carouthers

Ruling
Creditor who had notice of plan and did not object to or appeal confirmation was barred from asserting lien.
Procedural posture

In this Chapter 13 case involving an already confirmed plan, a creditor filed a motion for relief from stay, arguing that it had a lien on a vehicle owned by the debtors that was enforceable.

ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of In re Carouthers Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member

Consumer opinion summary, case decided on May 27, 2011 , LexisNexis #0711-062