Skip to main content

§ 1141(d)(6)

Mallinckrodt PLC, In re--Mallinckrodt PLC v. City of Rockford

Ruling
Claims for monopolization, anticompetitive agreements, and antitrust violations did notsound in fraud and, thus, were dischargeable. (Bankr. D. Del.)
Issue(s)
Effect of Confirmation; Discharge; Corporate Debtor Exceptions to Discharge; §

ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of Mallinckrodt PLC, In re--Mallinckrodt PLC v. City of Rockford Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member

Commercial opinion summary, case decided on June 16, 2021 , LexisNexis #0821-020

Fusion Connect, Inc., In re--United States v. Fusion Connect, Inc.

Ruling
Statutory FCC penalty for fraud committed against a third party was dischargeable. (Bankr. S.D.N.Y.)
Issue(s)
Effect of Confirmation; Discharge; Corporate Debtor Exceptions to Discharge.

ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of Fusion Connect, Inc., In re--United States v. Fusion Connect, Inc. Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member

Commercial opinion summary, case decided on July 09, 2020 , LexisNexis #0820-044

Exide Techs., In re

Ruling
Noncompensatory penalties were not excepted from discharge in corporate debtors’ case.(Bankr. D. Del.)
Issue(s)
Effect of Confirmation; Discharge; Corporate Debtor Exceptions to Discharge.

ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of Exide Techs., In re Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member

Commercial opinion summary, case decided on April 30, 2019 , LexisNexis #0719-025

United States ex rel. Minge v. Hawker Beechcraft Corp. (In re Hawker Beechcraft Inc.)

Ruling
Qui tam relators in an action brought under the False Claims Act had standing to bring a nondischargeability proceeding against debtor.
Issue(s)
Whether the claims of plaintiffs in a qui tam action brought under the False Claims Act may be excepted from discharge under the provision of BAPCPA and whether the FCA claims for damages qualified for the exception from discharge under section 1141(d)(6)(A)?

ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of United States ex rel. Minge v. Hawker Beechcraft Corp. (In re Hawker Beechcraft Inc.) Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member

Commercial opinion summary, case decided on March 27, 2014 , LexisNexis #0714-066