Skip to main content

§ 109(e)

In re Taylor

Ruling
Guarantees were noncontingent liquidated debts causing debtor to exceed chapter 13 limits.
Procedural posture

Debtors filed a petition under chapter 13 of the Bankruptcy Code, and a trustee was appointed to represent the bankruptcy estate. The trustee filed a motion to dismiss the debtors' case, claiming that the debtors were not eligible for Chapter 13 relief because their noncontingent, liquidated debts exceeded the debt limits allowed by 11 U.S.C.S. § 109(e).

ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of In re Taylor Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member

Consumer opinion summary, case decided on July 25, 2008 , LexisNexis #1008-002

In re Ellis

Ruling
Chapter 13 plan in which debtor would make no payments could not be confirmed.
Procedural posture

The matter before the court was the chapter 13 trustee's objection to confirmation of debtor's chapter 13 plan to which debtor filed a timely response.

ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of In re Ellis Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member

Consumer opinion summary, case decided on June 10, 2008 , LexisNexis #0708-037

In re Pinckney

Ruling
Chapter 13 case ordered converted or dismissed due to secured debt in excess of limits.
Procedural posture

A debtor was ordered to show cause why his chapter 13 bankruptcy case should not have been dismissed on the ground that the schedules listed more secured debt than the maximum allowed under 11 U.S.C.S. § 109(e).

ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of In re Pinckney Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member

Consumer opinion summary, case decided on May 09, 2008 , LexisNexis #0608-036

In re Bland

Ruling
Contributions from non-debtor spouse could be considered in determination that debtor was eligible under chapter 13.
Procedural posture

A creditor objected that a debtor was not an individual with regular income and was ineligible for chapter 13 relief under 11 U.S.C.S. § 109(e).

ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of In re Bland Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member

Consumer opinion summary, case decided on March 31, 2008 , LexisNexis #0408-073

In re Johnson

Ruling
Case dismissed for fraud due to debtor's failure to schedule large claim.
Procedural posture

After the court found, in a related adversary proceeding, that debtor, a husband who was later divorced from his wife, with whom he had filed a bankruptcy, had obtained confirmation of a chapter 13 plan through a fraud on the court and vacated the confirmation order, it issued an order to show cause why the husband's case should not be dismissed with prejudice on account thereof.

ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of In re Johnson Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member

Consumer opinion summary, case decided on March 18, 2008 , LexisNexis #0408-074

In re Star

Ruling
Chapter 13 case dismissed due to undisputed liquidated debt in excess of limits.
Procedural posture

Debtor filed a petition under chapter 13 of the Bankruptcy Code, and a trustee was appointed to represent the bankruptcy estate. The trustee filed a motion to dismiss the debtor's bankruptcy case and an unsecured creditor filed a motion to convert the case to one under chapter 7. The court held a consolidated hearing on both motions.

ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of In re Star Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member

Consumer opinion summary, case decided on February 01, 2008 , LexisNexis #0308-072

In re Margetis

Ruling
Chapter 13 case dismissed where voidable, but not unliquidated, default judgment caused debtor to exceed debt limits.
Procedural posture

The chapter 13 trustee filed a motion to dismiss the debtor's chapter 13 case for lack of eligibility, pursuant to 11 U.S.C. § 109(e), because the debtor exceeded the debt limit. At issue was a particular default judgment against the debtor which exceeded $800,000 in amount.

ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of In re Margetis Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member

Consumer opinion summary, case decided on December 14, 2007 , LexisNexis #0208-036

In re Blair

Ruling
Debtors not eligible under chapter 13 due to nonliquidated noncontingent debts in excess of limits guaranteed on behalf of company.
Procedural posture

Debtors filed separate petitions under chapter 13, and two lessors (creditors) filed joint motions to dismiss both cases, claiming that the debtors were not eligible to seek relief under chapter 13, pursuant to 11 U.S.C. § 109(e), because each debtor owed more than $307,675 in noncontingent, liquidated, unsecured debt.

ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of In re Blair Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member

Consumer opinion summary, case decided on December 13, 2007 , LexisNexis #0108-107

In re Smith

Ruling
Debtor's acquisition of property, without consideration, but subject to secured claims, caused debtor to exceed chapter 13 eligibility limit.
Procedural posture

A bankruptcy trustee asserted that a bankruptcy debtor's secured debt exceeded the debt limitation of 11 U.S.C. § 109(e) for eligibility for chapter 13 relief, and that the debtor filed the case in bad faith. The trustee moved to dismiss the debtor's case.

ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of In re Smith Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member

Consumer opinion summary, case decided on December 13, 2007 , LexisNexis #0108-037

In re Sims

Ruling
Reduction in homestead exemption to bring case within chapter 13 debt limits allowed on reconsideration.
Procedural posture

The debtors filed a motion for reconsideration of an order dismissing their bankruptcy case on the ground that their unsecured debt exceeded the limits of 11 U.S.C. § 109(e).

ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of In re Sims Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member

Consumer opinion summary, case decided on October 26, 2007 , LexisNexis #1107-127