Skip to main content

Shastal, In re--Sweet v. Majors Law, PLLC

Shastal, In re--Sweet v. Majors Law, PLLC

Ruling
Court found that even if plaintiffs' legal malpractice claim was not a civil proceeding "arisingin" a case under title 11, the court had subject matter jurisdiction based on "related to"jurisdiction. (Bankr. E.D. Mich.)
Issue(s)
Bankruptcy Cases and Proceedings.

ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of Shastal, In re--Sweet v. Majors Law, PLLC Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member

Consumer opinion summary, case decided on August 09, 2024 , LexisNexis #1024-073