Skip to main content

Narro v. Ford Motor Credit (In re Narro)

Narro v. Ford Motor Credit (In re Narro)

Ruling
Postdischarge repossession of vehicle securing reaffirmed debt did not violate discharge injunction.
Procedural posture

Plaintiff debtors filed a Complaint styled "Complaint to Compel Turnover of Property and for Willful Violation of the Discharge Injunction." Defendant was a vehicle creditor. The creditor moved to dismiss. The Motion to Dismiss cited Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(6) as the basis of the motion. The Memorandum in Support of the Motion, Part II, also sought dismissal for lack of subject matter jurisdiction, implicating Rule 12(b)(1).

ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of Narro v. Ford Motor Credit (In re Narro) Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member

Consumer opinion summary, case decided on September 12, 2012 , LexisNexis #1012-020