Skip to main content

In re Gelin

In re Gelin

Ruling
Individual chapter 11 debtors could not cram down without consent of mortgage creditors or payment in full due to continued operation of absolute priority rule.
Procedural posture

Before the court was debtors' cram down motion pursuant to 11 U.S.C.S. § 1129(b), as well as debtors' Second Plan of Reorganization. Other related motions were also before the court seeking to cram down the Plan on other non-objecting creditor classes. A creditor objected to confirmation based on the absolute priority rule.

ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of In re Gelin Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member

Consumer opinion summary, case decided on September 29, 2010 , LexisNexis #1010-126