Skip to main content

Mayo Clinic v. Halsam (In re Halsam)

Mayo Clinic v. Halsam (In re Halsam)

Ruling
Debtor’s appropriation of health insurance benefits was grounds for nondischargeable debt.(Bankr. D. Ariz.)
Issue(s)
Was debt nondischargeable due to debtor’s pocketing of benefits received directly from his insurance provider instead of paying Mayo Clinic as agreed?

ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of Mayo Clinic v. Halsam (In re Halsam) Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member

Consumer opinion summary, case decided on August 22, 2016 , LexisNexis #0916-052