Skip to main content

Zapata v. McCormick (In re McCormick)

Zapata v. McCormick (In re McCormick)

Ruling
Discharge denied due to debtor's undisclosed transfers made with intent to hinder, delay or defraud creditors.
Procedural posture

Plaintiff judgment creditor objected to the discharge of defendant debtor under 11 U.S.C.S. § 727(a).

ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of Zapata v. McCormick (In re McCormick) Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member

Consumer opinion summary, case decided on July 27, 2010 , LexisNexis #0910-095