- 11 U.S.C.
Tennessee Commerce Bank v. Cox (In re Cox)
May
21
2010
Ruling
Debt that debtor failed to schedule was nondischargeable and delayed motion to file proof of claim on behalf of creditor was denied.
Procedural posture
Plaintiff creditor filed a complaint seeking a determination that its debt was non-dischargeable under 11 U.S.C.S. § 523(a)(3) because defendant debtor failed to list or schedule the creditor. The chapter 13 debtor filed a motion to enlarge the time to file a claim on the creditor's behalf pursuant to Fed. R. Bankr. P. 9006(b)(1).
ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of Tennessee Commerce Bank v. Cox (In re Cox) Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member
Court
: