- 11 U.S.C.
In re Mupanduki
Jun
26
2006
Ruling
Court sustained debtor's objection to proof of claim since it was not "domestic support obligation."
Procedural posture
Creditor served as the debtor's domestic relations counsel and filed a claim for legal fees for her representation of the debtor. The creditor argued that her claim was a "domestic support obligation"entitled to priority treatment. The debtor filed an objection to the proof of claim.
ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of In re Mupanduki Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member
Court
: